Skip to main content

Is cryptobrokers.es a Scam? Security Check Results - Cryptobrokers.ru Reviews

cryptobrokers.es favicon

Is cryptobrokers.es Safe? Security Analysis for Cryptobrokers.ru

https://cryptobrokers.es

Check if cryptobrokers.es is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsYandex MetrikaGoogle reCAPTCHA+2 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:49:22 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Cryptobrokers.es is a multilingual online platform specializing in monitoring and comparing cryptocurrency exchangers and electronic payment systems. The site provides users with updated exchange rates, reviews, and reserve information to facilitate optimal currency conversions. It targets users engaged in electronic asset transactions, offering a user-friendly interface and frequent data updates. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security measures include HTTPS and CAPTCHA integration, though some security headers are missing. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and lack of WHOIS data limit full trust assessment. Overall, the platform is functional and serves a niche financial market with moderate professionalism and security.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsYandex MetrikaGoogle reCAPTCHADataTablesYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on cryptocurrency exchange monitoring. It leverages a business model based on providing comparative data and user reviews without direct cooperation with exchangers. The multilingual presence suggests targeting a broad international audience. Revenue streams likely include advertising and possibly affiliate partnerships, though no explicit affiliate programs were detected. The site maintains a moderate market position with a comprehensive list of supported currencies and payment systems. Partnerships appear limited to sister sites in different languages. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and integration with social media channels.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but would benefit from enhanced headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cryptobrokers.ru

Description:

Cryptobrokers es un portal que ofrece un sistema de monitoreo para intercambiadores en línea, facilitando la conversión de activos electrónicos y criptomonedas con opciones rentables, evaluación basada en opiniones reales, y selección del mejor curso de cambio.

Key Services:
Monitoreo de intercambiadoresComparación de tasas de cambioOpiniones y reputación de intercambiadoresInformación actualizada de reservas y comentarios
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsYandex MetrikaGoogle reCAPTCHADataTablesYoast SEO
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Regular updates implied by plugin versions

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsYandex Metrika
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Yandex.RTB (commented out)
Tracking Pixels:
Yandex Metrika
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=beget.com
DNS Lookups:0/10

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:87.236.16.118
Name Servers:
ns1.beget.comDNS only
ns1.beget.proDNS only
ns2.beget.comDNS only
ns2.beget.proDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.beget.com
10: mx1.beget.com
SOA:Serial: 1608758414, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=beget.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery, DataTables, and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The presence of Yoast SEO plugin indicates attention to search engine optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and some DNS prefetching. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a content-driven financial monitoring site, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about cryptobrokers.es

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website