Skip to main content

Is cryptobrokers.pro a Scam? Security Check Results - Cryptobrokers.ru Reviews

cryptobrokers.pro favicon

Is cryptobrokers.pro Safe? Security Analysis for Cryptobrokers.ru

https://cryptobrokers.pro

Check if cryptobrokers.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsYandex MetrikaGoogle reCAPTCHA+2 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:05:38 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Cryptobrokers.pro operates as an online monitoring platform for electronic money and cryptocurrency exchangers, providing users with updated exchange rates, customer reviews, and quick access to optimal currency conversion options. The platform targets internet users engaged in digital asset transactions, offering a user-friendly interface and a broad range of supported currencies and payment systems. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, integrating analytics tools like Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika, and employing Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for this sector but limits transparency. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with a professional appearance but lacks some compliance and contact transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsYandex MetrikaGoogle reCAPTCHADataTablesYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform positions itself as a reliable and comprehensive exchange rate monitoring service, catering to a medium-sized audience interested in cryptocurrency and electronic money exchanges. Its business model revolves around providing comparative data and user reviews to facilitate informed currency conversions. The presence of multiple language versions and social media channels suggests an international reach. Revenue streams likely include advertising and partnerships with exchangers. The lack of direct company contact details and formal policies may impact trust but is somewhat mitigated by the site's longevity and content quality.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Cryptobrokers.pro demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from spam. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cryptobrokers.ru

Description:

Cryptobrokers is a portal providing monitoring of online exchangers with the best exchange rates for electronic money and cryptocurrencies. It offers a wide range of exchange tools, profitable transfer options, customer reviews, and quick money transfers.

Key Services:
Exchange rate monitoringExchange office reviewsCurrency conversion assistanceExchange rate comparison
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsYandex MetrikaGoogle reCAPTCHADataTablesYoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsYandex Metrika
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Yandex.RTB (commented out)
Tracking Pixels:
Yandex Metrika
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=beget.com
DNS Lookups:0/10

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:87.236.16.118
Name Servers:
ns1.beget.comDNS only
ns1.beget.proDNS only
ns2.beget.comDNS only
ns2.beget.proDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx1.beget.com
20: mx2.beget.com
SOA:Serial: 1608758414, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=beget.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, DataTables, and Google services for analytics and tag management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices via Yoast SEO. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site integrates multiple external resources and social media links, indicating a well-connected digital presence. However, the absence of advanced security headers and formal privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about cryptobrokers.pro

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website