Skip to main content

Is ct.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - ct.gov Reviews

C

Is ct.gov Safe? Security Analysis for ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

Check if ct.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentN/alarge
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:22:13 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website portal.ct.gov is a government portal domain for the state of Connecticut. However, the site content is currently inaccessible due to geographic blocking enforced by Amazon CloudFront, resulting in a 403 error page. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the site's content, metadata, or technical infrastructure. The WHOIS data is incomplete, lacking registrar, creation, expiry, and registrant details, which limits trust and legitimacy assessments. The domain appears to be government-related but the absence of WHOIS data and nameservers is unusual and may be due to registry privacy or policy restrictions. Overall, the site cannot be evaluated for content quality, security posture, or compliance due to access restrictions.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain is a .gov subdomain for Connecticut, it likely serves as a government portal providing access to state services and information. The business model is essential government service provision. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of accessible content and metadata prevents assessment of market positioning or competitive advantages. The domain is presumably large in scale given its government nature, but no further business intelligence can be derived from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content and HTTP headers. The site is hosted behind Amazon CloudFront which is enforcing geographic blocking, indicating some level of security control. However, no security headers or SSL/TLS information is available. The absence of WHOIS data and nameservers is a concern for transparency. No privacy, cookie, or incident response policies are detectable. Overall, the security maturity appears low from the available data, but this may be due to access restrictions rather than actual security deficiencies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Work with hosting and CDN providers to allow legitimate geographic access for security and compliance assessments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

CloudFront Detected

The page is a 403 error generated by Amazon CloudFront blocking access from the user's country.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to geographic blocking by Amazon CloudFront WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.valigov.email ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:dkim(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@valigov.email
Forensic Reports:dmarc.ruf@ct.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.ct.gov
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid Until:9/22/2026 (381 days)
SANs:*.ct.gov, ct.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(355 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:159.247.0.240
Name Servers:
ns1.cen.ct.gov
ns2.cen.ct.gov
SOA:Serial: 2020093347, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:268ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.valigov.email ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site is hosted behind Amazon CloudFront which is currently blocking access from the user's country, resulting in a 403 error page. No HTML metadata, scripts, forms, or external links are present in the accessible content. No CMS or frameworks can be detected. The lack of WHOIS registrar and nameserver data is unusual and suggests incomplete domain registration information or privacy restrictions. The technical infrastructure appears to rely on AWS CDN services but lacks publicly accessible content or technical details for further analysis.
Analyze Another Website