Skip to main content

Is cta.tech a Scam? Security Check Results - Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® Reviews

cta.tech favicon

Is cta.tech Safe? Security Analysis for Consumer Technology Association (CTA)®

Check if cta.tech is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter Universal Website Tag+3 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:31:46 PM
74
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® is a leading membership organization representing companies in the technology industry, including startups and multinational corporations. It is best known as the organizer of CES®, the world's premier technology event. CTA focuses on advocacy, standards development, research, and member services to support innovation and growth in the technology sector. The website reflects a mature and professional organization with a clear mission to empower technology companies through collaboration and policy influence. The target audience includes technology companies seeking industry advocacy, standards, and networking opportunities. The business model is membership-based, providing services and resources to its members.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter Universal Website TagFacebook PixelReddit PixelClinch Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CTA holds a strong market position as a key industry association with over 1200 member companies and multiple divisions, councils, and working groups. Its competitive advantage lies in its advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill, standard-setting activities, and the globally recognized CES event. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and research publications. The partnership ecosystem includes event partners and technology companies. Growth indicators include extensive research reports and active member engagement. The organization's operations are well-established with a focus on industry influence and member value.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts suggests a need for careful privacy management. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and privacy documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details to improve privacy transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Consumer Technology Association (CTA)®

Description:

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® is the leading membership organization for companies in the technology industry and the brand behind CES®. Its mission is to help innovators of all sizes grow their businesses through advocacy, standard setting, and insights.

Key Services:
AdvocacyResearchStandards developmentEvents (including CES®)Membership services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter Universal Website TagFacebook PixelReddit PixelClinch Pixel
Frameworks:
Google Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labeling

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)LinkedIn AnalyticsFacebook AnalyticsTwitter AnalyticsBing AnalyticsReddit Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsGoogle AdsTwitter AdsFacebook AdsReddit AdsClinch
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter Universal Website TagReddit Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_s00042806.autospf.email ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:196a8143d54e157@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
Forensic Reports:196a8143d54e157@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:45.223.163.83, 45.223.183.83
Name Servers:
ns21.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns22.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: cta-tech.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025100100, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_s00042806.autospf.email ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with asynchronous loading of multiple analytics and advertising scripts, including Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Twitter Tag, and Reddit Pixel. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Hosting appears to be on a reliable platform with fast content delivery. There is no explicit CMS detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate due to multiple third-party scripts but overall user experience is smooth. Technical risks include reliance on many external tracking services and the absence of visible security and privacy documentation.
Analyze Another Website