Is ctez.app Safe? Security Analysis for Ctez | Your portal to Tezos DeFi
Check if ctez.app is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Ctez.app is a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform focused on the Tezos blockchain ecosystem. It offers services such as token swaps between tez and ctez, liquidity provision, and analytics for Tezos DeFi users. The platform targets crypto investors and users interested in collateralized tez tokens without opportunity cost from delegation. The website presents a professional and modern interface built with React and Chakra UI, optimized for mobile devices and providing a good user experience. However, it lacks publicly available privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as direct contact or incident response information, which are important for compliance and trust. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, which is common in the crypto space but reduces transparency slightly. Overall, the platform appears legitimate and technically sound but would benefit from improved privacy and security disclosures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the niche DeFi sector within the Tezos blockchain ecosystem, providing tokenized collateralized tez and liquidity services. Its business model revolves around decentralized finance mechanisms, targeting crypto users seeking fungible and decentralized collateralized assets. The presence of a GitHub repository indicates an open-source or transparent development approach. The lack of detailed company information and contact details suggests a small-sized operation focused on the crypto community. The platform's partnerships or integrations include external DeFi services like Plenty Network. Growth potential depends on adoption within the Tezos community and broader DeFi market trends.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with input validation, indicating a baseline security posture. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no published security policies or incident response contacts are available. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding formal policies, security headers, and incident response information.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Collateralized tez that is fungible, decentralized, and without opportunity cost from missing out on delegation. Achieved with a bit of mathematics.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of secure forms with input validation
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a decentralized finance portal focused on Tezos blockchain
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 56 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings