Skip to main content

Is cube.exchange a Scam? Security Check Results - Cube Exchange Australia Pty Ltd Reviews

cube.exchange favicon

Is cube.exchange Safe? Security Analysis for Cube Exchange Australia Pty Ltd

Check if cube.exchange is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceAustraliamedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebAssembly (possible)Cloudflare Stream+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:49:26 AM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cube Exchange Australia Pty Ltd operates a professional cryptocurrency trading platform focused on Bitcoin, Solana, and other digital assets. The platform emphasizes zero-fee spot trading, institutional-grade security, and real-time order execution, targeting both retail and institutional traders. The company maintains a strong market position as a fast and secure exchange with a user-friendly interface and mobile app availability. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted likely on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement, MPC wallet technology, and secure input handling, although explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is robust with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Cube Exchange presents a trustworthy and professional digital asset trading service with room for enhanced transparency in security and incident response.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebAssembly (possible)Cloudflare StreamRudderStack Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cube Exchange targets the competitive cryptocurrency exchange market with a business model centered on zero-fee spot trading and rewards programs to incentivize volume and loyalty. Its multi-channel presence across social media and app stores supports customer engagement and brand trust. The company operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on blockchain-based asset trading. While WHOIS data is privacy-protected, the website's professional presentation and compliance documentation suggest legitimacy. The platform's growth potential is supported by its technical infrastructure and marketing efforts, although direct contact information is limited, which may impact customer support perceptions.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The platform demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, security headers, and advanced wallet security technologies like MPC. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of a public security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact reduces transparency and may hinder trust from security-conscious users. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR-compliant, indicating good data protection practices. The security score is high but could be improved by publishing explicit security governance documents and providing clear channels for reporting security incidents.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cube Exchange Australia Pty Ltd

Description:

Cube Exchange is a leading cryptocurrency trading platform offering secure, high-performance trading of Bitcoin (BTC), Solana (SOL), and other digital assets. It provides zero-fee spot trading, institutional-grade security, deep liquidity pools, and real-time order execution.

Key Services:
Spot trading of cryptocurrenciesToken swapsPortfolio managementRewards and loyalty programsMobile app for iOS
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebAssembly (possible)Cloudflare StreamRudderStack Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
WebiOS (mobile app)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Non-custodial wallet architecture
  • MPC technology for wallet security
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure input fields with validation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
RudderStack AnalyticsVercel Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
RudderStack AnalyticsVercel Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Intercom (widget.intercom.io)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.sumsub.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.braze.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:57aa4dee9da84b038838312419c3471e@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
athena.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
wilson.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382517040, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.sumsub.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.braze.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, hosted likely on Vercel, which supports fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The use of RudderStack and Vercel analytics indicates a moderate level of user tracking balanced with privacy compliance. The site features well-structured metadata, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social media integration. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. The technical implementation is robust with good accessibility and SEO optimization, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is advised to maintain security and performance.
Analyze Another Website