Skip to main content

Is culsight.com a Scam? Security Check Results - culsight.com Reviews

C

Is culsight.com Safe? Security Analysis for culsight.com

Check if culsight.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 8:58:12 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at https://culsight.com/lander is currently a minimal placeholder or parking page with no substantive business content, contact information, or policies. The site loads basic HTML with references to Google Adsense and a parking-lander JavaScript and CSS bundle, indicating it is not actively used for business or customer engagement. There is no visible company branding, description, or services offered. The technical infrastructure is minimal, relying on basic React-based static content with no detected CMS or advanced platform. Security posture cannot be properly assessed due to lack of content and metadata; no HTTPS or security headers information is available. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided. Overall, the site appears inactive or under development, with very low trust and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business-related content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no indication of market positioning, revenue streams, or target customer segments. The domain appears to be parked or reserved without active business operations. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The lack of contact details and policies further suggests no current operational business presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is indeterminate given the minimal content and lack of security headers or HTTPS information. The presence of Google Adsense scripts indicates some advertising activity but no advanced security or compliance measures are evident. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are found. The site does not demonstrate adherence to GDPR or other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is very low with significant gaps in basic security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a fully functional website with clear business information and contact details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal with no visible business or contact information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:re+g1o04g8b2cy@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.1TLSv1.2

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.130.190, 15.197.148.33
Name Servers:
ns63.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns64.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: culsight-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025092901, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:213ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a React-based static front-end with JavaScript and CSS loaded from wsimg.com parking-lander resources. Google Adsense is integrated for advertising. No CMS or backend technologies are detected. The site lacks meta tags, SEO optimization, and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization is basic given the viewport meta tag but no responsive content is present. The site appears to be a parked domain or placeholder with no active business functionality.
Analyze Another Website