Skip to main content

Is culvpq.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 国家公务员考试录用网 Reviews

Is culvpq.com Safe? Security Analysis for 国家公务员考试录用网

Check if culvpq.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentChinasmall
jQueryJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 9:20:00 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

国家公务员考试录用网 is a specialized Chinese government exam information portal providing comprehensive resources for civil servant exam candidates, including announcements, exam schedules, position listings, and results. The website targets individuals preparing for national and provincial civil servant exams in China. Technically, the site uses a custom-built platform with jQuery and standard web technologies, hosted under a recently registered domain with July Name Limited. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms and includes SEO optimizations via Baidu scripts. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. Business credibility is supported by domain registration consistency and official ICP and public security filings. Overall, the site is functional and relevant for its audience but could improve security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

jQueryJavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche market in the Chinese government exam preparation sector, serving a targeted audience of exam candidates. Its business model is informational, relying on providing timely and relevant exam data and resources. The presence of multiple regional subdomains indicates a strategy to localize content for various provinces and cities. The site maintains partnerships with related exam and education portals, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth potential exists through expanding services such as online courses or paid resources. However, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy mechanisms may limit trust and user engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like CSP or HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, indicating limited transparency. The use of third-party Baidu scripts introduces potential risk vectors if not regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Privacy compliance gaps, especially regarding cookie consent, present regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

国家公务员考试录用网

Description:

国家公务员考试录用网为考生提供2025年全国公务员考试公告、报名、时间、科目、真题、职位表、成绩查询等服务。

Key Services:
考试公告报名入口成绩查询考试真题职位表查询考试大纲面试名单资格复审
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a specialized portal for Chinese national and provincial civil servant exam information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(329 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.39.152.167
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.com
ns2.julydns.com
SOA:Serial: 1751919024, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:241ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and custom CSS/HTML. It lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, which may limit scalability and maintainability. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. The hosting and domain registration are recent but consistent with the site's purpose. Technical debt may exist due to lack of modern security practices and absence of accessibility features. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations.
Analyze Another Website