Skip to main content

Is curationexchange.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Curation Costs Exchange Reviews

curationexchange.org favicon

Is curationexchange.org Safe? Security Analysis for Curation Costs Exchange

Check if curationexchange.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Bootstrap SliderBootstrap Form HelpersPace.js+5 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:06:16 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Curation Costs Exchange is a specialized platform focused on understanding and comparing digital curation costs to support smarter investments. It serves organizations and professionals involved in digital preservation by providing cost assessment tools, benchmarking capabilities, and vendor service information. The platform is supported by reputable organizations and funded by the European Union, positioning it as a niche but credible resource in the digital preservation community. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS and leverages a variety of standard web libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and DataTables, delivering a moderately performant and mobile-optimized experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit HTTP security headers, indicating room for improvement in hardening its security posture. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response information publicly. Strategic recommendations include enhancing DNS security, adding security headers, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve trust and resilience.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Bootstrap SliderBootstrap Form HelpersPace.jsBootstrap EditableDataTablesChart.jsBootstrap SwitchBootstrap Tour

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform occupies a niche market segment focused on digital curation cost transparency and benchmarking, catering primarily to research institutions, digital preservation professionals, and funding bodies. Its business model revolves around providing a collaborative platform for cost comparison and investment planning rather than direct commercial sales. The presence of testimonials from respected organizations and EU funding support enhances its credibility and market positioning. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized operation with a focused target audience. The lack of phone contact and physical addresses indicates a primarily digital and research-oriented engagement model. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple reputable digital preservation organizations, reinforcing its collaborative approach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@4cproject.eu

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact user trust and compliance readiness. The use of multiple third-party libraries necessitates regular vulnerability assessments to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a research platform but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Curation Costs Exchange

Description:

Understanding and comparing digital curation costs to support smarter investments

Key Services:
Cost assessment toolsCost comparison platformVendor services listingsEducational resources on digital curation costs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Bootstrap SliderBootstrap Form HelpersPace.jsBootstrap EditableDataTablesChart.jsBootstrap SwitchBootstrap Tour
Frameworks:
Joomla
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • CSRF token present in page scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a specialized platform for digital curation cost analysis and benchmarking

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

20 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(334 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:139.162.245.179
Name Servers:
dns1.stabletransit.com
dns2.stabletransit.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Joomla CMS with a tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4.1, DataTables, Chart.js, and other common libraries. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar (IONOS SE). No advanced platforms or cloud services are detected. The site uses standard cookie consent scripts and CSRF tokens, indicating attention to basic security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers suggests technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could be modernized and secured further.
Analyze Another Website