Skip to main content

Is cursor.directory a Scam? Security Check Results - Cursor Directory Reviews

C

Is cursor.directory Safe? Security Analysis for Cursor Directory

Check if cursor.directory is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsTailwind CSSShadcn UIRadix UI+4 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:32:58 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cursor Directory is a niche technology community platform focused on providing a comprehensive directory of Cursor rules, MCP servers, job listings, and member profiles. The platform targets developers and Cursor users seeking to enhance their workflows and connect with like-minded professionals. The website leverages modern web technologies including React, Next.js, and Tailwind CSS, hosted on Vercel, ensuring a fast and responsive user experience. Despite its recent domain registration in 2024, the platform presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on developer tools and community engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and does not currently publish privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. No blocking or WAF mechanisms interfere with content accessibility. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and well-structured for its target audience.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsTailwind CSSShadcn UIRadix UIVercel DNSSupabase (for storage)JavaScriptTypeScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a community-driven directory and resource hub for Cursor users, offering curated rules, MCP server listings, and job opportunities. Its business model appears to be content and community-centric, potentially monetizing through partnerships or job listings. The platform's market position is specialized within the developer tools ecosystem, focusing on Cursor users. The absence of detailed business contact information and policies suggests an early-stage or lean operation. The presence of multiple external links to partner or related services indicates an ecosystem approach. Growth indicators include active job postings and member engagement features. Strategic partnerships with MCP providers and job platforms could enhance its market reach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and is registered with a reputable registrar. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing attacks. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, which could leave the site vulnerable to common web attacks such as clickjacking or MIME sniffing. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cursor Directory

Description:

Enhance your Cursor with custom rules, find MCP servers, and join a community of Cursor enthusiasts.

Key Services:
Cursor rules directoryMCP servers listingJob postings related to CursorCommunity member profilesRule generation tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsTailwind CSSShadcn UIRadix UIVercel DNSSupabase (for storage)JavaScriptTypeScript
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Domain status OK

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a community and resource directory for Cursor users and developers

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

55/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 21 days

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
high(5 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.16.129, 216.150.1.65
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.com
ns2.vercel-dns.com
SOA:Serial: 1724501910, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:140ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Next.js frameworks, styled with Tailwind CSS and Shadcn UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting on Vercel provides scalable and performant infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of Supabase for storage and integration with external MCP servers and job platforms shows a well-integrated ecosystem. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Performance is fast with asynchronous script loading and preloading of fonts and assets. Technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Analyze Another Website