Skip to main content

Is customer-alliance.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Customer Alliance Reviews

customer-alliance.com favicon

Is customer-alliance.com Safe? Security Analysis for Customer Alliance

https://customer-alliance.com

Check if customer-alliance.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Tag Manager+7 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 2:12:11 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Customer Alliance operates a SaaS platform focused on simplifying customer feedback and review management for businesses. The company positions itself as a provider of stress-free review management software, targeting businesses that want to streamline customer reviews, surveys, and satisfaction metrics. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and modern plugins, supporting multiple languages and optimized for SEO and mobile devices. The technical infrastructure includes popular tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and WP Rocket, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security policies and headers. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, though the website content and technical setup suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is well-structured and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerWP RocketElementorYoast SEOComplianz GDPR pluginJet MenuUltimate ElementorSlider Revolution

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Customer Alliance targets the technology sector with a focus on customer experience management. Its SaaS business model leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to attract medium-sized businesses seeking to improve customer satisfaction and online reputation. The company uses multilingual support to reach a broader European audience. While no parent or subsidiary companies are identified, the presence of social media and SEO tools indicates active marketing efforts. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit trust for some users. The company appears to be established since 2021, with a consistent brand presence and good content quality. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not identified in the data provided.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

c*****@2x.png
c*****@2x-1.png
c*****@2x.png

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and there is no visible security or incident response policy. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could improve transparency and trust. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity introduces moderate tracking but is managed with consent. The absence of contact information for security incidents is a gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Customer Alliance

Description:

Ditch complex workflows & boring spreadsheets. Embrace efficiency with one platform for customer reviews, surveys, and satisfaction metrics.

Key Services:
Customer reviews managementSurveysSatisfaction metrics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Tag ManagerWP RocketElementorYoast SEOComplianz GDPR pluginJet MenuUltimate ElementorSlider Revolution
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot WordPress plugin
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and fully functional with no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:136.243.93.247 ip4:144.76.105.34 ip4:148.251.136.80 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:2001288.spf01.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 23 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.198.87.183
Name Servers:
ns5.kasserver.comDNS only
ns6.kasserver.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2508291011, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:172ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:136.243.93.247 ip4:144.76.105.34 ip4:148.251.136.80 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:2001288.spf01.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Elementor, WP Rocket, and various SEO and GDPR compliance plugins. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is multilingual, supporting at least five languages, enhancing its market reach. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and script deferral techniques applied. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit hosting provider information. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about customer-alliance.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website