Skip to main content

Is cxense.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Piano Reviews

cxense.com favicon

Is cxense.com Safe? Security Analysis for Piano

Check if cxense.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptTinypassCxenseFramerAxeptio
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:48:36 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Piano Audience is a technology-focused SaaS platform designed to help businesses integrate, segment, and activate customer data to deliver personalized audience experiences. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting business customers interested in advanced data-driven marketing solutions. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Tinypass and Cxense for analytics and marketing, hosted on a platform built with Framer. Security posture appears limited based on available data, with no explicit security headers or privacy policies detected, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the website is accessible and functional, but lacks visible compliance documentation and contact information, which are critical for trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptTinypassCxenseFramerAxeptio

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Piano operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions for customer data management and audience engagement. The business model focuses on enabling clients to unify and activate their customer data for personalized marketing. The company appears to have a medium-sized market presence with consistent branding and professional content. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools suggests a competitive advantage in data-driven audience solutions. However, the absence of detailed company registration or contact information limits full verification of business credentials. The platform likely targets medium to large enterprises seeking sophisticated audience management capabilities.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the website is moderate to low based on the absence of detected security headers and lack of visible privacy or cookie policies. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure, but the presence of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits. The lack of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates potential gaps in security readiness and transparency. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident, which could pose regulatory risks. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security issues are recommended.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Piano

Description:

Explore Piano Audience, a powerful solution for integrating, segmenting, and activating customer data. Understand and engage your audience with personalized experiences.

Key Services:
Customer data integrationAudience segmentationPersonalized experience activation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptTinypassCxenseFramerAxeptio
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Cxense
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
CxenseTinypass
Marketing Tools:
TinypassCxenseAxeptio
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:151.236.35.177/24 ip4:92.48.103.58/24 ip4:142.250.150.0/24 ip4:205.201.128.0/20 ip4:198.2.128.0/18 ip4:148.105.8.0/21 ip4:103.151.192.0/23 ip4:185.12.80.0/22 ip4:188.172.128.0/20 ip4:192.161.144.0/20 ip4:216.198.0.0/18 ip4:198.245.81.0/24 ip4:1 36.147.176.0/24 ip4:13.111.0.0/16 ip4:136.147.182.0/24 ip4:136.147.135.0/24 ip4:199.122.123.0/24 include:_spf.intacct.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:stspg-customer.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.protection.outl ook.com include:mailgun.org -all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports-agg@piano.io
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports-forensic@piano.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:piano.io
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/17/2025 (42 days)
SANs:piano.io, *.piano.io, *.dev.piano.io +4 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(332 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.16.144.111, 104.16.143.111
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6810:8f6f, 2606:4700::6810:906f
Name Servers:
emma.ns.cloudflare.com
ian.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: piano-io.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382522587, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:151.236.35.177/24 ip4:92.48.103.58/24 ip4:142.250.150.0/24 ip4:205.201.128.0/20 ip4:198.2.128.0/18 ip4:148.105.8.0/21 ip4:103.151.192.0/23 ip4:185.12.80.0/22 ip4:188.172.128.0/20 ip4:192.161.144.0/20 ip4:216.198.0.0/18 ip4:198.245.81.0/24 ip4:1 36.147.176.0/24 ip4:13.111.0.0/16 ip4:136.147.182.0/24 ip4:136.147.135.0/24 ip4:199.122.123.0/24 include:_spf.intacct.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:stspg-customer.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.protection.outl ook.com include:mailgun.org -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website utilizes a modern tech stack with JavaScript libraries such as Tinypass for paywall management, Cxense for analytics, and Framer for site building. The presence of Axeptio indicates some level of cookie consent management, though no explicit cookie policy was found. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive meta tags and design. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, the absence of detected security headers and incomplete compliance documentation suggest technical debt in security and privacy implementation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Analyze Another Website