Skip to main content

Is cyberpress.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Cyber Press Reviews

cyberpress.org favicon

Is cyberpress.org Safe? Security Analysis for Cyber Press

Check if cyberpress.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO PremiumjQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:11:02 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cyber Press is a specialized online media outlet providing the latest news and analysis in the cybersecurity domain. Established in 2003, it targets cybersecurity professionals and enthusiasts by delivering timely updates on cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and security incidents. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with SEO optimization and a professional design that supports good user experience and mobile responsiveness. The business model focuses on content publication and audience engagement through news articles and analysis.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO PremiumjQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche position in the cybersecurity news market, leveraging a focused content strategy to attract a specialized audience. Its competitive advantage lies in providing fast and dedicated coverage of cyber threats and security developments. The presence of social media integration, particularly LinkedIn, supports professional networking and brand visibility. However, the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies may limit trust among privacy-conscious users. The business appears to be small-sized with no visible parent or subsidiary companies.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@outlook.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve domain security. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security or incident response policy on the site. Forms for user login and registration are present but lack visible advanced security features or disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing clear security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cyber Press

Description:

Cyber Press offers a dedicated & fast Cyber Security News Coverage, so you can keep track of Activities & stay Sture.

Key Services:
Cybersecurity news coverageCybersecurity analysisLatest updates on cyber threats and vulnerabilities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO PremiumjQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack Stats
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack (stats.wp.com)
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional cybersecurity news portal with regularly updated content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

59/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.antispamcloud.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cyberpress.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/23/2025 (46 days)
SANs:cyberpress.org, *.cyberpress.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(191 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.95.116, 172.67.144.188
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3036::ac43:90bc, 2606:4700:3035::6815:5f74
Name Servers:
jule.ns.cloudflare.com
kevin.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: txpro3.fcomet.com
SOA:Serial: 2378971058, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:197ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.antispamcloud.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for search engine optimization. It leverages jQuery and MediaElement.js for frontend functionality. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare DNS services and GoDaddy registrar. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). There is opportunity to improve technical robustness by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers.
Analyze Another Website