Skip to main content

Is cyberscoop.com a Scam? Security Check Results - CyberScoop Reviews

cyberscoop.com favicon

Is cyberscoop.com Safe? Security Analysis for CyberScoop

Check if cyberscoop.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
WordPress 6.8.2Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelHotjar+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:01:47 AM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CyberScoop is a well-established cybersecurity news media outlet founded in 2003, focusing on breaking cybersecurity news and public sector threats. It operates under the Scoop News Group umbrella, which manages several sister sites targeting government and technology sectors. The website offers news articles, podcasts, videos, events, and insights tailored to cybersecurity professionals and public sector leaders. The business model relies on advertising and event sponsorships, supported by a professional and consistent brand presence.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelHotjarParselyElasticPressHubSpot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CyberScoop holds a strong market position as a leading public sector cybersecurity news provider. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized content targeting government and cybersecurity audiences, supported by a network of sister sites. The company leverages multiple digital channels including social media and events to engage its audience. Revenue streams primarily include advertising and sponsored events. The partnership ecosystem includes related Scoop News Group sites, enhancing cross-promotion and market reach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@cyberscoop.com

Phone Numbers (1)

202*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. However, it lacks DNSSEC, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program. The absence of security headers and limited privacy compliance indicators suggest room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a media site but could be enhanced to build greater trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CyberScoop

Description:

CyberScoop delivers up-to-the-minute breaking cybersecurity news and is the leading public sector media company reaching top leaders

Key Services:
Cybersecurity newsPodcastsVideosEventsInsights
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelHotjarParselyElasticPressHubSpot
Frameworks:
Yoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientRenewProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelTwitter AnalyticsHotjarParselyHubSpot
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelTwitter AnalyticsHotjarParselyHubSpot
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional cybersecurity news media outlet focused on public sector and government cybersecurity.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

55/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 960-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:2153467.spf04.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(960-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:d215001073@rua.easydmarc.us
Forensic Reports:d215001073@ruf.easydmarc.us

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(178 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:13.33.235.55, 13.33.235.12, 13.33.235.19, 13.33.235.110
Name Servers:
ns-1130.awsdns-13.org
ns-1962.awsdns-53.co.uk
ns-248.awsdns-31.com
ns-629.awsdns-14.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx4.googlemail.com
10: aspmx5.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:159ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:2153467.spf04.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Parsely, ElasticPress, and HubSpot. Hosting is via AWS DNS infrastructure. The site shows good SEO optimization, accessibility, and mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a professional media platform but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website