Skip to main content

Is cygnilabs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Cygni Labs Reviews

cygnilabs.com favicon

Is cygnilabs.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cygni Labs

Check if cygnilabs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:12:56 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cygni Labs appears to be a small technology-related entity with a minimal online presence. The website is extremely sparse, containing only a logo image and a single contact email address. There is no descriptive content, metadata, or interactive elements to provide insight into the company's services, market position, or business model. The domain was registered in 2019 and is managed through reputable providers, indicating legitimacy but limited digital maturity. Technically, the website lacks modern SEO, accessibility, and security features. There are no security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or analytics tools. The hosting infrastructure inferred from DNS points to Google Cloud DNS, which is a reliable platform, but the site itself is very basic and likely under development or serving as a placeholder. From a security perspective, the absence of security headers and policies is a concern, though no critical vulnerabilities or WAF protections are detected. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, with no privacy protection or suspicious patterns. Overall, the security posture is weak due to lack of implemented best practices but no immediate threats are evident. The overall risk is low in terms of malicious activity but moderate in terms of business and security maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing website content and metadata, implementing security headers and HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and adding contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business intelligence available is limited due to minimal website content. The company likely operates in the technology sector, possibly as a startup or small business given the domain age and size. There is no information on revenue streams, partnerships, or market positioning. The lack of social media or external links suggests a nascent digital marketing strategy. The single contact email indicates a direct communication channel but no broader customer engagement infrastructure. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships cannot be assessed from the available data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@cygnilabs.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is basic with no advanced protections detected. The domain uses reputable registrar and DNS providers but lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible. The absence of HTTPS enforcement (not confirmed but no mention) and security best practices reduces the security score. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cygni Labs

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal with only a logo image and a single email contact.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
email

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(186 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.111.153, 185.199.108.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.110.153
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 8, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with minimal HTML and no detected scripts or frameworks. The lack of metadata, Open Graph tags, JSON-LD structured data, or analytics tools indicates low digital maturity. Hosting appears to be via Google Cloud DNS, and domain registration is through Squarespace Domains II LLC, suggesting possible use of Squarespace or similar platforms though no CMS is detected in the HTML. Performance and mobile optimization are basic due to minimal content. There is technical debt in the absence of security headers and SEO best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, adding structured data, and improving accessibility and responsiveness.
Analyze Another Website