Skip to main content

Is czin.sk a Scam? Security Check Results - CZIN.sk Reviews

czin.sk favicon

Is czin.sk Safe? Security Analysis for CZIN.sk

Check if czin.sk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaSlovakiamedium
HTMLCSSJavaScriptjQuery 1.2.6Matomo Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:12:36 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

CZIN.sk is a Slovak internet portal established in 2005, offering a comprehensive suite of services including internet search, web directory, email, news aggregation, TV program listings, and weather forecasts. The portal targets Slovak-speaking internet users seeking a centralized platform for various online services. It operates primarily on an advertising-supported business model, leveraging multiple ad networks and affiliate programs to generate revenue. The website maintains a consistent brand presence and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScriptjQuery 1.2.6Matomo AnalyticsGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The portal holds a regional position in the Slovak media and internet services market, focusing on aggregating and cataloging web content and services. Its partnerships with sites like linkstip.sk and mehry.cz enhance its content offerings and user engagement. The business model relies heavily on advertising and affiliate marketing, with no direct e-commerce or subscription services evident. Growth indicators include regular content updates and integration of multiple service verticals. The partnership ecosystem is diverse, involving advertising networks and content providers.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with the presence of a cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-compliant privacy policy. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.2.6) poses potential security risks. There is no evidence of modern security headers such as CSP or HSTS, and no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available. The absence of visible contact information for security or incident response further limits transparency. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, improvements are needed to enhance security maturity and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CZIN.sk

Description:

Portál pre všetkých prepájajúci najlepšie služby na slovenskom internete. Ponúka vyhľadávanie, e-mail, spravodajstvo, katalóg, informácie, tv program a iné užitočné na jednom mieste.

Key Services:
Internet searchWeb directoryEmail serviceNews aggregationTV program listingsWeather forecasts
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScriptjQuery 1.2.6Matomo AnalyticsGoogle Adsense
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseVDX.tvIndex ExchangeQuantcastBeeswaxIOSovrnAdkernelAdikteevRTB House
Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
Google AdsenseMatomo Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Slovak internet portal offering search, directory, email, news, and other services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

45/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:hotmail.com ip4:46.28.106.159 ip4:89.221.213.102 ip4:89.221.213.101 ip4:185.82.213.38 ip4:77.78.104.0/24 ip4:185.28.192.0/22 ip4:185.28.193.0/24 include:_spf.we.wedos.net include:spf.seznam.cz ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

43 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:46.28.106.159
Name Servers:
ns.wedos.comDNS only
ns.wedos.czDNS only
ns.wedos.euDNS only
ns.wedos.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: 1269702206.pamx1.hotmail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025012601, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:201ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:hotmail.com ip4:46.28.106.159 ip4:89.221.213.102 ip4:89.221.213.101 ip4:185.82.213.38 ip4:77.78.104.0/24 ip4:185.28.192.0/22 ip4:185.28.193.0/24 include:_spf.we.wedos.net include:spf.seznam.cz ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using traditional web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery 1.2.6. It integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking and multiple Google Adsense ad units for monetization. The site uses external fonts from Google Fonts and includes various embedded scripts for ads and tracking. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or modern web framework. The hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not explicitly available from the content. Technical debt is indicated by the use of outdated libraries and lack of modern security practices.
Analyze Another Website