Skip to main content

Is dai.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Darba Aizsardzības Institūts Reviews

dai.lv favicon

Is dai.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Darba Aizsardzības Institūts

Check if dai.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPress 5.5.15WPBakery Page BuilderSlider Revolution 5.4.8.3jQuery 1.12.4Google Fonts (Raleway, Lato)+5 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:34:47 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Darba Aizsardzības Institūts is a Latvian company specializing in occupational safety and fire safety services, offering a comprehensive range of consulting, training, audits, and compliance solutions. Established since 2006, it positions itself as a trusted and competent institution serving Latvian businesses. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and provides clear information about its services and contact details. The company targets local organizations requiring workplace safety and fire protection expertise. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution. It uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form plugins, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the overall security posture is adequate for a small business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with good content quality and compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers and transparency around security policies would enhance its security posture and trustworthiness further.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.5.15WPBakery Page BuilderSlider Revolution 5.4.8.3jQuery 1.12.4Google Fonts (Raleway, Lato)Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (UA-156914018-1)Contact Form 7AutoptimizeLazySizes

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the occupational safety and fire safety consulting sector in Latvia, targeting small to medium-sized enterprises and organizations. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offering, including risk assessments, mandatory health checks, training, and fire safety documentation. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through consulting contracts and training sessions. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem, including a related domain dai.digitalbo.com. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with updated content and blog posts. The company demonstrates a stable market presence with a focus on compliance and quality service delivery.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

d*****@dai.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712230****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA “Darba aizsardzības institūts”

Registration Number:

LV 50003609511

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, it lacks several recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie consent and privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Darba Aizsardzības Institūts

Description:

Darba aizsardzības institūts - uzticams, profesionāls, atbildīgs sadarbības partneris. Darba aizsardzības un ugunsdrošības pakalpojumi ērti un vienuviet!

Key Services:
Occupational safety system creation and maintenanceWork environment risk assessmentInternal work environment monitoringMandatory health checksOccupational safety and fire safety training and instructionFire safety auditsFire safety instruction developmentEvacuation plan and fire water supply scheme development
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.5.15WPBakery Page BuilderSlider Revolution 5.4.8.3jQuery 1.12.4Google Fonts (Raleway, Lato)Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (UA-156914018-1)Contact Form 7AutoptimizeLazySizes
Frameworks:
Redux
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure form plugins

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.233.182.194 ip4:37.203.243.38 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mailigen.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:94.100.0.185
Name Servers:
ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns3.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: dai-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:80.233.182.194 ip4:37.203.243.38 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mailigen.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a standard but widely supported infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized. Lazy loading is implemented for images to improve load times. However, the site could benefit from further performance tuning and accessibility improvements. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is typical for small to medium business websites, balancing ease of use with functionality.
Analyze Another Website