Is dakota.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Dakota
Check if dakota.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Dakota is a fintech company offering a modern business banking platform powered by stablecoins and backed by U.S. Treasuries. The company targets businesses seeking faster, seamless, and secure global financial services. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on innovation in digital banking. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure, and registered through a reputable registrar, Squarespace Domains II LLC. The domain age of over 9 years aligns well with the company's founding year, indicating stability and legitimacy. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place; however, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and moderately trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Dakota operates in the finance sector, specifically focusing on business banking with a fintech approach leveraging stablecoins and treasury-backed assets. The business model centers on providing digital banking services that improve the speed and security of global finance for businesses. The company appears to be small-sized with a niche market position emphasizing innovation. The lack of detailed contact information and certifications on the website suggests a lean operation or early-stage digital presence. The presence of a Twitter social media link indicates some engagement with the fintech community. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content or domain data. The company benefits from a stable domain registration and consistent branding, which supports credibility in the competitive fintech space.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and the domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited statuses to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a published privacy policy, cookie policy, and incident response contact channels indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. The security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Dakota
A modern banking platform, powered by stablecoins and backed by U.S. Treasuries, to make global finance faster, seamless, and secure.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited set
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 68 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings