Skip to main content

Is datareporter.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - datareporter.eu Reviews

datareporter.eu favicon

Is datareporter.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Softwarelösungen für deinen Datenschutz » aus Österreich

Check if datareporter.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyAustriasmall
FramerJavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:17:28 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.datareporter.eu presents itself as a provider of legal tech software solutions focused on data protection, targeting primarily the Austrian market. The content is in German and emphasizes expertise in securing data privacy through software offerings. The site is built using the Framer framework, indicating a modern design approach, and includes Google Adsense for advertising. However, the absence of visible contact information, privacy policies, and cookie consent mechanisms limits the site's compliance and trustworthiness from a privacy perspective. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid's privacy restrictions for .eu domains, which is typical but restricts full domain legitimacy assessment. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies but lacks visible security headers and detailed SSL configuration information, which are important for a secure web presence. No forms or user data collection mechanisms were detected in the provided HTML snippet, reducing immediate concerns about data handling but also limiting engagement channels. The site appears mobile-optimized with good design quality and user experience, though SEO and accessibility features are basic. From a security standpoint, the lack of security headers and privacy compliance documentation are notable gaps. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or malicious content based on the provided data. Overall, the site is moderately trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving SEO and accessibility. These steps would enhance user trust, compliance with GDPR, and overall security posture.

Detected Technologies

FramerJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Datareporter.eu operates in the niche of legal technology with a focus on data protection software solutions, serving clients likely within Austria and German-speaking regions. The business model centers on software provision, possibly SaaS or licensed solutions, aimed at organizations needing to comply with data privacy regulations. The market positioning is not explicitly stated but the emphasis on Austrian expertise suggests a regional focus. The presence of Google Adsense indicates some monetization through advertising, possibly supplementing software sales or trials. The lack of detailed company information, contact data, or certifications limits visibility into scale and partnerships. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the data. The company appears to be a small entity with a specialized product offering in the technology sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@datareporter.eu
2*****@datareporter.eu

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is basic with several areas for improvement. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are critical for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency in security management. No forms or user input fields were found, reducing immediate risk of injection attacks but also limiting user interaction. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level with recommendations to adopt best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Wir sind deine Legal Tech Experten aus Österreich. Unsere Softwarelösungen sichern deinen Datenschutz. ➡️ Jetzt kostenlos testen!

Key Services:
Legal Tech software solutionsData protection software
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerJavaScript
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to EURid privacy restrictions

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 50% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com ip4:52.29.241.31 ip4:18.158.177.168 ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none(50% enforcement)
Forensic Reports:office@datareporter.eu

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
ns-1282.awsdns-32.orgDNS only
ns-149.awsdns-18.comDNS only
ns-1987.awsdns-56.co.ukDNS only
ns-633.awsdns-15.netDNS only
MX Records:
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.google.com ip4:52.29.241.31 ip4:18.158.177.168 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Framer framework, leveraging modern JavaScript and web fonts from Google Fonts. Resources are loaded from framerusercontent.com and webcachex-eu.datareporter.eu, indicating a CDN or hosting arrangement possibly linked to Framer's infrastructure. The site includes Google Adsense for advertising. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. No forms or interactive input elements were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details and SSL configuration are not available from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website