Skip to main content

Is datenraumkaernten.at a Scam? Security Check Results - datenraumkaernten.at Reviews

datenraumkaernten.at favicon

Is datenraumkaernten.at Safe? Security Analysis for Datenraum Kärnten

Check if datenraumkaernten.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentAustriasmall
Blazor WebAssemblyBootstrap 5jQuery 3.7.1Shepherd.jsLeaflet.js+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:42:15 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Datenraum Kärnten is a regional government-supported digital platform likely focused on providing data room and geospatial information services for the Austrian state of Kärnten. The website uses modern web technologies including Blazor WebAssembly and various JavaScript libraries to deliver interactive mapping and data visualization features. However, the visible HTML content is minimal, indicating a single-page application that loads content dynamically. The site is funded by local government departments and displays multiple official logos, reinforcing its public sector affiliation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking visible security headers and privacy policies. No contact or compliance information is present, limiting transparency and user trust. Overall, the site serves a niche regional audience with basic digital maturity and moderate technical implementation.

Detected Technologies

Blazor WebAssemblyBootstrap 5jQuery 3.7.1Shepherd.jsLeaflet.jsLeaflet.markerclusterChart.jsPikaday

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform targets regional government entities, municipalities, and local stakeholders in Kärnten, Austria. Its business model is public sector funded, focusing on providing data room services and geospatial data visualization. The site leverages partnerships with local government departments, as evidenced by displayed logos and funding acknowledgments. Competitive advantages include official backing and integration of modern web technologies. Revenue streams are likely public funding rather than commercial sales. Growth indicators are not visible from the site content. The partnership ecosystem appears limited to regional government bodies. Strategic observations suggest the platform could benefit from enhanced user engagement features and improved compliance transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is used, but no security headers were detected in the provided data. The absence of privacy, cookie, and incident response policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and NIS2 regulations. No forms or input fields were found to assess input validation or secure data handling. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be related to a data room service or platform associated with the region of Kärnten (Carinthia), Austria, supported by local government departments. It likely serves as a digital or geographic information platform for municipalities or regional stakeholders.

Key Services:
Data room servicesGeospatial data visualizationMunicipal information sharing
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Blazor WebAssemblyBootstrap 5jQuery 3.7.1Shepherd.jsLeaflet.jsLeaflet.markerclusterChart.jsPikaday
Frameworks:
Blazor
Platforms:
WebAssembly
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Blazor WebAssembly single-page application with minimal visible content in raw HTML.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:datenraumkaernten.at
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (87 days)
SANs:datenraumkaernten.at, *.datenraumkaernten.at

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.68.206, 104.26.14.81, 104.26.15.81
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:e51, 2606:4700:20::681a:f51, 2606:4700:20::ac43:44ce
Name Servers:
chloe.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
jay.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2379458459, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:89ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Blazor WebAssembly, Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.7.1, and several JavaScript libraries for mapping (Leaflet) and UI enhancements (Shepherd.js, Pikaday). The use of WebAssembly indicates a modern approach to client-side rendering. Performance is moderate given the technology stack, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no explicit ARIA or accessibility tags detected. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking meta descriptions, Open Graph tags, or structured data. The hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. Technical risks include potential security gaps due to missing headers and lack of visible compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website