Skip to main content

Is dbpedia.org a Scam? Security Check Results - DBpedia Association Reviews

dbpedia.org favicon

Is dbpedia.org Safe? Security Analysis for DBpedia Association

Check if dbpedia.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPress 6.7.2jQuery 3.7.1UIkitALTCHA spam protectionContact Form 7+2 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 5:18:07 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

DBpedia Association operates a leading open knowledge graph platform providing extensive linked data resources, tools, and community services. The organization supports researchers, data scientists, and industry users with datasets, SPARQL endpoints, and data cataloging services. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies and good SEO and accessibility practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, spam protection, and secure forms, though explicit security headers and incident response policies could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms demonstrate GDPR awareness. WHOIS data is unavailable, slightly reducing domain trust, but the website's professional content and active community mitigate concerns. Overall, the site is a trustworthy and valuable resource in the linked data ecosystem.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.7.2jQuery 3.7.1UIkitALTCHA spam protectionContact Form 7Was This Helpful Pro pluginYoast SEO plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

DBpedia Association holds a strong market position as a non-profit technology and education entity focused on linked open data. Its business model centers on community support, data provision, and knowledge sharing rather than commercial sales. The association has a medium size with an international member network from academia and industry. Partnerships with GitHub and community forums enhance its ecosystem. The website's content quality and branding consistency support its credibility. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and grants. Growth indicators include active events, training, and continuous dataset releases.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

d*****@infai.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, spam protection via ALTCHA, and secure contact forms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and a published security policy or incident response page indicates room for improvement. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent management. The lack of a security.txt file and incident response contacts suggests limited formal vulnerability disclosure readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with formal policies and additional headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

DBpedia Association

Description:

DBpedia provides a platform for data, tools and services. Explore current projects and applications and learn about DBpedia datasets.

Key Services:
Knowledge graph datasetsLinked data accessSPARQL endpointsData cataloging and versioning (Databus)Community events and training
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.7.2jQuery 3.7.1UIkitALTCHA spam protectionContact Form 7Was This Helpful Pro pluginYoast SEO plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Spam protection on contact forms (ALTCHA)
  • Use of CAPTCHA-like verification
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Usercentrics (consent management)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.dbpedia.org
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:10/8/2025 (64 days)
SANs:www.dbpedia.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(144 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.134.204.180
AAAA Records:2a12:4180:dc1:903::2
Name Servers:
ns71.domaincontrol.com
ns72.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
10: mailstore1.secureserver.net
0: smtp.secureserver.net
SOA:Serial: 2025070903, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:36ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, UIkit, and various plugins for SEO, spam protection, and user interaction. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses Google Analytics and Usercentrics for tracking and consent management, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Analyze Another Website