Skip to main content

Is dcg.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Digital Currency Group Reviews

dcg.co favicon

Is dcg.co Safe? Security Analysis for Digital Currency Group

Check if dcg.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Stateslarge
jQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAFullPage.jsLottie animations+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:12:48 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Digital Currency Group (DCG) is a leading investor and operator in the cryptocurrency industry, established in 2010. The company supports emerging talent and crypto technology with a mission to accelerate the development of a better financial system. DCG manages an extensive portfolio including equity investments, fund investments, and token holdings across more than 25 countries. Their subsidiaries include well-known entities such as Genesis, Grayscale, CoinDesk, and Foundry, covering institutional financial services, asset management, media, decentralized infrastructure, consumer wallets, and trading platforms. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting investors, startups, and technology innovators in the crypto space. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cloudflare DNS services, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAFullPage.jsLottie animationsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

DCG holds a strong market position as a capital engine in the crypto industry, leveraging a diversified business model that spans multiple sectors within finance and technology. Their revenue streams likely include investment returns, asset management fees, and operational income from subsidiaries. The company targets institutional investors, crypto startups, and technology developers. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and a global footprint indicates a mature and expansive partnership ecosystem. The website's content and structure support their credibility and market leadership, although direct contact information is limited to a contact form, which may be a strategic choice to manage inquiries.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and employs Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Domain registration is protected by privacy services, which is standard for large enterprises. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. The site does not display cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and DNS security improvements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Digital Currency Group

Description:

We are the capital engine supporting emerging talent & crypto technology. On its mission to accelerate the development of a better financial system.

Key Services:
Equity investmentsFund investmentsToken & digital asset holdingsInstitutional financial servicesCrypto asset managementMedia, data, and eventsDecentralized infrastructure & miningConsumer wallet servicesWealth & life managementTrading platforms
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAFullPage.jsLottie animationsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Client update, transfer, delete, and renew prohibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (implied by GTM)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com include:sent-via.netsuite.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io ip4:50.57.12.216 ip4:50.57.12.217 ip4:94.236.55.204 ip4:94.23 6.55.200 -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:DMARC-Review@dcg.co
Forensic Reports:DMARC-Review@dcg.co

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(315 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:16.16.119.222, 51.21.126.187, 13.49.111.177
Name Servers:
janet.ns.cloudflare.com
stan.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
20: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2382136343, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:cust-spf.exacttarget.com include:sent-via.netsuite.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io ip4:50.57.12.216 ip4:50.57.12.217 ip4:94.236.55.204 ip4:94.23 6.55.200 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and FullPage.js for enhanced user experience and animations via Lottie. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, with Google reCAPTCHA integrated for bot protection. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses client-side navigation enhancements and asynchronous script loading to optimize user experience. Technical debt appears low, but adding accessibility improvements and cookie consent mechanisms would enhance compliance and usability.
Analyze Another Website