Skip to main content

Is de.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - De.Fi Reviews

de.fi favicon

Is de.fi Safe? Security Analysis for De.Fi

Check if de.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
ReactWebpackGoogle Tag ManagerIntercomCanny SDK+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:43:06 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

De.Fi is a relatively new decentralized finance platform founded in 2022, specializing in crypto security solutions such as smart contract auditing and liquidity analysis, alongside portfolio management tools supporting numerous blockchains and protocols. The company positions itself as an innovator in the DeFi space, targeting cryptocurrency investors and users seeking enhanced security and asset management. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging React, Webpack, and cloud hosting with integrated analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though improvements are needed in DNSSEC implementation and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is moderate with transparent WHOIS data but limited direct contact information on the site.

Detected Technologies

ReactWebpackGoogle Tag ManagerIntercomCanny SDKAWS DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the finance sector focusing on decentralized finance and crypto security. Its business model revolves around providing multi-layer security solutions and portfolio dashboards, catering to a niche market of crypto investors. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates active marketing and brand building. The domain age aligns with the startup nature of the business. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company appears to leverage partnerships with cloud and analytics providers but no direct partner domains are listed.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Company Registration

Legal Name:

FLEXPERT

Registration Number:

DSO-FZCO-3674

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern security practices but lacks DNSSEC and key security headers, which could expose it to certain DNS and web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder rapid response to security issues. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting industry best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

De.Fi

Description:

De.Fi is the Inventor of Crypto's First Antivirus - the multi-layer security solution that automatically audits crypto smart contracts and analyzes assets' liquidity. As well as the Web3 SuperApp - Crypto's Largest Portfolio Dashboards that supports 50+ blockchains and 450+ protocols.

Key Services:
Crypto smart contract auditingLiquidity analysisPortfolio dashboards supporting 50+ blockchains and 450+ protocols
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactWebpackGoogle Tag ManagerIntercomCanny SDKAWS DNS
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerTwitter Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Twitter AdsGoogle DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Twitter PixelGoogle Analytics (implied)
Marketing Tools:
IntercomCanny
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:13.33.235.55, 13.33.235.2, 13.33.235.90, 13.33.235.109
Name Servers:
ns-12.awsdns-01.comDNS only
ns-1249.awsdns-28.orgDNS only
ns-1924.awsdns-48.co.ukDNS only
ns-708.awsdns-24.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:172ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with Webpack bundling and is hosted on AWS infrastructure. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Twitter Ads, Intercom, and Canny for analytics, marketing, and user feedback. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or SPA architecture. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and missing DNSSEC.
Analyze Another Website