Skip to main content

Is decent.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - decent.xyz Reviews

decent.xyz favicon

Is decent.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Decent

Check if decent.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
FramerCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:58:56 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Decent.xyz is a technology-focused website dedicated to improving cryptocurrency user experience (UX). The site is built using modern design tools such as Framer and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring a reliable and secure infrastructure. The domain is well-established, created in 2015, indicating a mature presence in the crypto UX space. However, the website content is minimal and primarily serves as a landing page with a concise business description. There is no visible contact information, privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and does not implement security headers or incident response information.

Detected Technologies

FramerCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to target cryptocurrency users and developers interested in enhancing user experience within the crypto ecosystem. The business model likely revolves around providing UX services or products related to crypto. The market position is not explicitly stated, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The website branding is consistent and professional but lacks detailed business information or trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The absence of contact details and compliance policies may hinder credibility and user engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and Cloudflare DNS usage. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and incident response contact information indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also represents a compliance gap, especially concerning GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Making crypto UX decent.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built with Framer, indicating modern design tools.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:9a7e71e3bcc843d4aa2eb4708cab1e93@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:decent.xyz
Issuer:E7
Valid Until:11/18/2025 (73 days)
SANs:*.decent.xyz, decent.xyz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(82 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.43.194, 172.66.40.62
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3108::ac42:283e, 2606:4700:3108::ac42:2bc2
Name Servers:
harlee.ns.cloudflare.com
phil.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382563465, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and design assets hosted on framerusercontent.com and fonts.gstatic.com. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS, which provides performance and security benefits. The HTML is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO could be improved with more comprehensive metadata and structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Analyze Another Website