Skip to main content

Is decima.fund a Scam? Security Check Results - Decima Reviews

decima.fund favicon

Is decima.fund Safe? Security Analysis for Decima

Check if decima.fund is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
FramerRoboto fontInter fontKode Mono fontZen Dots font
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:22:10 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Decima is a specialized investment fund focused on providing access to unique opportunities in Japan's crypto market. The website presents a professional and focused business description targeting investors interested in Japan and cryptocurrency assets. The technical infrastructure is built using Framer, leveraging modern web fonts and a responsive design, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, there is a lack of visible security headers, privacy policies, and contact information, which limits the overall security posture and compliance maturity. The absence of WHOIS registrant details due to privacy protection is common in financial sectors but restricts full legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in security and compliance transparency.

Detected Technologies

FramerRoboto fontInter fontKode Mono fontZen Dots font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Decima operates in the niche intersection of finance and technology, specifically targeting crypto investments in Japan. Its business model revolves around fund management and providing investors with access to Japan-specific crypto opportunities. The website content is concise and targeted, with no extraneous information. The lack of detailed company information, contact details, and regulatory disclosures suggests a small-sized entity possibly in early stages or maintaining privacy for competitive reasons. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains indicates a standalone operation. The site’s market positioning is niche and specialized, appealing to a focused investor segment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the Decima website is limited based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring secure communications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, reducing transparency for security researchers. While no explicit vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the lack of security best practices and transparency poses a moderate risk to users and the business.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Decima

Description:

Decima is a Japan + crypto native fund enabling access to unique Japan opportunities.

Key Services:
Investment fund managementAccess to Japan crypto opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerRoboto fontInter fontKode Mono fontZen Dots font
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

πŸ›‘οΈSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

πŸ‘€GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

πŸ›‘οΈNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

πŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.decima.fund ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

πŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

πŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
ns53.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns54.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024060300, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.decima.fund ~all

⚑Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

πŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping tool, with extensive use of web fonts including Roboto, Inter, Kode Mono, and Zen Dots. The site appears to be responsive and well-structured with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with no obvious errors or broken elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern but lacks advanced security and analytics integrations, indicating potential areas for technical enhancement and monitoring.
Analyze Another Website