Skip to main content

Is deck.gl a Scam? Security Check Results - OpenJS Foundation Reviews

deck.gl favicon

Is deck.gl Safe? Security Analysis for OpenJS Foundation

Check if deck.gl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptWebGL2WebGPUReact
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:41:38 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

deck.gl is an open source GPU-powered data visualization framework designed for large-scale data analysis and rendering. It is supported by the OpenJS Foundation and targets developers and data scientists who require high-performance visualization tools integrated with popular mapping platforms. The website reflects a mature project with a consistent brand and professional content focused on technical users. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging JavaScript, WebGL2, WebGPU, and React, and is built on the Docusaurus CMS framework, ensuring good performance, accessibility, and SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and compliance documentation are missing, which reduces trust and compliance scores. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptWebGL2WebGPUReact

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

deck.gl occupies a strong niche in the technology sector as a specialized visualization framework. Its open source business model is supported by the OpenJS Foundation, indicating community and industry backing. The project benefits from integration with major base map providers, enhancing its utility and market reach. The absence of direct contact information and privacy policies suggests a focus on developer communities rather than direct commercial sales. The presence of a Slack workspace, GitHub repository, and blog indicates active community engagement and content marketing. The domain age and registration details align well with the project's timeline, supporting legitimacy. There are no indications of advertising or tracking, emphasizing a developer-centric approach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The overall security maturity is moderate, suitable for an open source project but with room for enhancement to meet enterprise-grade standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

OpenJS Foundation

Description:

deck.gl is a GPU-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, enabling highly performant large-scale data visualization.

Key Services:
GPU-powered data visualization frameworkReusable visualization layersIntegration with base map providersReact-friendly APIs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptWebGL2WebGPUReact
Frameworks:
Docusaurus v3.6.3
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:deck.gl
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:11/5/2025 (60 days)
SANs:deck.gl

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(61 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.108.153, 185.199.110.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.111.153
AAAA Records:2606:50c0:8000::153, 2606:50c0:8001::153, 2606:50c0:8002::153, 2606:50c0:8003::153
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns2.dnsimple-edge.net
ns3.dnsimple.com
ns4.dnsimple-edge.org
SOA:Serial: 1670954719, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript, WebGL2, WebGPU, and React, supported by the Docusaurus CMS framework. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). Performance is optimized with deferred script loading and prefetching of assets. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are good, ensuring a broad user reach. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the domain is registered with a reputable registrar. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site lacks some security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce risk.
Analyze Another Website