Skip to main content

Is deeptechatelier.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Deep Tech Atelier Reviews

deeptechatelier.com favicon

Is deeptechatelier.com Safe? Security Analysis for Deep Tech Atelier

Check if deeptechatelier.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuery
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 7:19:04 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Deep Tech Atelier is a specialized event organizer hosting the largest deep tech conference in the Baltics, targeting entrepreneurs, scientists, investors, and industry leaders. The website promotes the upcoming Deep Tech Atelier 2025 event in Riga, Latvia, showcasing agenda, speakers, startup pitch competition, and expo information. The business model centers on event organization and industry networking within the technology sector. The site is built on WordPress with SEO optimization and accessibility features, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a leading deep tech conference in the Baltic region, focusing on innovation and technology sectors. Its key services include event hosting, startup competitions, and B2B expos, targeting a professional audience of tech entrepreneurs and investors. The website content and structured data reinforce its market position and branding consistency. However, the absence of explicit contact details and privacy compliance mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and regulatory adherence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

d*****@liaa.gov.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration, ensuring secure communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Deep Tech Atelier

Description:

The Baltics’ largest deep tech event, Deep Tech Atelier 2025, brings together entrepreneurs, scientists, investors, and industry leaders.

Key Services:
deep tech event organizationconference hostingstartup pitch competitionB2B expo
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuery
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google site verification

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO plugin
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based event site for Deep Tech Atelier 2025 in Riga, Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(895 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:85.31.96.36
Name Servers:
ns59.domaincontrol.com
ns60.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2025070900, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:99ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress 6.7.2 with the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern CMS with SEO capabilities. It uses jQuery for client-side scripting and includes accessibility features such as font size and contrast adjustments. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance tools. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security and privacy implementation are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website