Skip to main content

Is defined.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - Defined Reviews

D

Is defined.fi Safe? Security Analysis for Defined

Check if defined.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsApollo GraphQLMaterial-UISentry
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:40:54 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Defined.fi is a technology-focused platform providing real-time token prices, charts, wallet tracking, and a trading terminal across multiple blockchain networks including Solana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Sui, BSC, and Tron. The platform targets cryptocurrency traders and blockchain users seeking multi-chain analytics and trading capabilities. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, with Apollo GraphQL for data management and Material-UI for UI components, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of explicit contact information, suggests areas for improvement in compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms, but missing security headers and policies reduce the overall security confidence. Overall, the platform presents a professional and functional service with room to enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsApollo GraphQLMaterial-UISentry

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the cryptocurrency technology sector, offering a niche service that aggregates and presents multi-chain token data and trading tools. Its business model likely revolves around providing advanced analytics and trading interfaces to crypto traders and enthusiasts. The platform's market position is specialized, focusing on multi-network coverage which can be a competitive advantage. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits transparency but does not necessarily detract from operational credibility. Growth potential exists given the expanding DeFi and multi-chain ecosystem. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is presumably enabled (given the URL), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps. The platform uses Sentry for error tracking, which is a positive security practice. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could be improved to enhance security culture and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Defined

Description:

Real-time token prices, charts, wallet tracking & trading terminal for Solana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Sui, BSC, Tron & many more networks

Key Services:
Real-time token pricesChartsWallet trackingTrading terminal
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsApollo GraphQLMaterial-UISentry
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Sentry
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Sentry
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a multi-chain token trading and analytics platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 400-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(400-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: 3fvyloyqd75tudkup3jcp32wudzpuqnroybtyah3ssmpd7zmy6ia.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.1.1
Name Servers:
ns-1035.awsdns-01.orgDNS only
ns-199.awsdns-24.comDNS only
ns-2041.awsdns-63.co.ukDNS only
ns-852.awsdns-42.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
15: 3fvyloyqd75tudkup3jcp32wudzpuqnroybtyah3ssmpd7zmy6ia.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React, Next.js, Apollo GraphQL, and Material-UI, indicating a contemporary and scalable infrastructure. The use of Sentry for error monitoring shows attention to operational stability. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and CSS optimizations. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. There is no CMS detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Analyze Another Website