Skip to main content

Is deko.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Deko Reviews

D

Is deko.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Deko

Check if deko.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuery 3.5.1CookiebotGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:58:09 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Deko is a Latvian company specializing in wooden buildings and constructions such as summer houses, garden houses, saunas, warehouses, gazebos, carports, and garages. The website serves as a product catalog and service portal targeting the local Latvian market. The company appears to have been founded in 2021 and offers delivery and installation services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO, jQuery, and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is well-structured with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS in use and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is good with detailed cookie disclosures but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuery 3.5.1CookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Deko operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on wooden constructions. Its business model revolves around showcasing a wide product catalog and providing related services such as delivery and installation. The company targets homeowners and property developers in Latvia seeking quality wooden structures. The website demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a positive market position locally. Integration with major analytics and marketing platforms indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. Lack of explicit contact details and corporate information on the website suggests room for improvement in business transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@deko.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. However, no HTTP security headers were detected in the provided data, and no security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file and contact channels for security incidents reduces readiness for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces tracking but is disclosed transparently. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, incident response information, and regular security audits.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Deko

Description:

Koka būves un konstrukcijas - vasarnīcas, dārza mājas, pirtis, noliktavas, lapenes, nojumes, garāžas, auto nojumes un vēl daudz kas cits.

Key Services:
vasarnīcasdārza mājaspirtisnoliktavaslapenesnojumesgarāžasauto nojumespiegādemontāža
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuery 3.5.1CookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjar
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseMeta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking Pixels:
HotjarFacebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:b5c75b6312454587bab25faa946b16d7@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.96.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.64.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001
Name Servers:
amy.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
ram.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: deko-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.5.1, and uses Swiper.js for sliders. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with detailed categories and descriptions. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and includes multiple external scripts from trusted domains. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design. Accessibility is basic but present. No hosting provider or server details were found. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website