Skip to main content

Is delaplainefoundation.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Delaplaine Foundation, Inc. Reviews

delaplainefoundation.org favicon

Is delaplainefoundation.org Safe? Security Analysis for Delaplaine Foundation, Inc.

Check if delaplainefoundation.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statessmall
WordPressjQuerySmart Slider 3Yoast SEOGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:38:12 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Delaplaine Foundation, Inc. is a private family foundation based in Frederick, Maryland, focused on philanthropic giving to enrich communities and families. The foundation supports programs in arts, education, health, human services, historical preservation, and spiritual enlightenment primarily in Frederick County and surrounding areas. It operates as a small non-profit entity with a legacy dating back to 2003, positioning itself as a leader in local philanthropic efforts. The website provides clear information about grant application processes, deadlines, and sponsorship protocols, targeting nonprofit organizations and community stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Smart Slider 3 and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Analytics and StatCounter for visitor tracking. Hosting is provided by Hostopia Canada Corp, and the domain is longstanding and stable. However, there are gaps in privacy compliance, as no explicit privacy or cookie policies are found, and security headers are missing. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve domain security. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries visibly. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are recommended for improved security posture. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance compliance and security practices. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to implement privacy and cookie policies, enable DNSSEC, add security headers, and provide incident response information to strengthen trust and security culture.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQuerySmart Slider 3Yoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsResponsive Menu Pro

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Delaplaine Foundation holds a strong market position as a philanthropic leader in Frederick County, Maryland. Its business model centers on grant making and sponsorships to nonprofits aligned with its mission. The foundation's revenue streams likely come from family endowments and investments. Target customers include local nonprofits and community organizations seeking funding. The foundation demonstrates growth indicators through updated grant-making practices and increased local impact focus. Partnerships appear limited to community advisory councils and nonprofit grantees. The website reflects a stable operation with clear governance and transparency through annual reports and certifications. Strategic observations suggest a focus on sustainability and local community enrichment, with potential to expand digital engagement and compliance maturity.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

i*****@delaplainefoundation.org
b*****@delaplainefoundation.org
j*****@delaplainefoundation.org

Phone Numbers (2)

301*******
301*******

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Delaplaine Foundation, Inc.

Registration Number:

EIN 52-2278038

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no critical vulnerabilities are visible in the website code or plugins. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could mitigate DNS spoofing risks. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear basic, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies, which may expose compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. The security culture is not explicitly communicated, and no dedicated security contacts are provided. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Delaplaine Foundation, Inc.

Description:

A private family foundation based in Frederick, MD, supporting programs dedicated to the enrichment of communities and families.

Key Services:
Grant makingSponsorshipsCommunity enrichment programs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQuerySmart Slider 3Yoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsResponsive Menu Pro
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with consent
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsStatCounter
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
StatCounter
Tracking Pixels:
StatCounter
Marketing Tools:
Google Site Kit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:173.13.237.54 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:5119526b0e@rua.easydmarc.us
Forensic Reports:5119526b0e@ruf.easydmarc.us

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1965 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.11, 141.193.213.10
Name Servers:
ns0.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns3.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns4.dnsmadeeasy.com
MX Records:
10: delaplainefoundation-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2008010135, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:173.13.237.54 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Smart Slider 3, and Yoast SEO plugin for SEO optimization. Hosting is provided by Hostopia Canada Corp, with a domain registered since 2003, indicating a mature infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses Google Analytics and StatCounter for visitor tracking, integrated via JavaScript. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and enhanced security.
Analyze Another Website