Skip to main content

Is delicious.com a Scam? Security Check Results - names.com Reviews

N

Is delicious.com Safe? Security Analysis for names.com

Check if delicious.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Bootstrap 3.3.6jQuery 2.1.4Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Montserrat, Lato, Roboto)Stripe.js v2+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:17:10 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Names.com operates as a specialized boutique brokerage firm focusing on premium and category-defining domain names. Established since 1995, it holds a strong market position by emphasizing quality over quantity in domain sales, leasing, and acquisitions. The company targets premium domain buyers and sellers globally, offering expert brokerage and acquisition services with transparent and professional client engagement. The website reflects this positioning with clear domain listings, pricing, and a professional design. Technically, the website employs a modern but somewhat dated tech stack including Bootstrap 3, jQuery 2.1, and integrates third-party services such as Stripe for payments and Escrow.com for secure transactions. Hosting is provided via InMotion Hosting, and the site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, some technical improvements are possible, including enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and reputable third-party payment and escrow services, which enhance transactional security. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of explicit security headers, and missing security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with a solid business model and credible domain registration data. Strategic improvements in security posture and privacy compliance would further strengthen its risk profile and customer trust.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 3.3.6jQuery 2.1.4Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Montserrat, Lato, Roboto)Stripe.js v2SweetAlertGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Names.com holds a niche leadership role in the premium domain brokerage market, focusing on high-value exact match domains. Its competitive advantage lies in its dedication to quality, outbound brokering expertise, and transparent client relations. The business model revolves around domain sales, leasing, and acquisitions, with financing options subject to seller approval. Revenue streams likely include commissions and fees from domain transactions and brokerage services. The target customers are premium domain investors, businesses seeking brandable domains, and end-users requiring exact match domains. The company maintains a selective inventory to ensure dedicated service and high closing rates. Partnerships with Escrow.com enhance transactional security and trust. The firm’s long domain age and consistent branding support its market credibility and growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

t*****@names.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of names.com is moderate. The site benefits from HTTPS encryption and integration with secure payment and escrow platforms, which mitigate transactional risks. However, the lack of DNSSEC exposes the domain to potential DNS spoofing risks. The absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public security policy or incident response contact information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness visibility. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance measures to reduce risk and improve customer confidence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

names.com

Description:

Leading boutique premium domain name brokerage, sales, and acquisitions firm specializing in brandable and category-defining premium exact match domain names. Focus on quality over quantity with expert outbound brokering and acquisition services.

Key Services:
Premium domain salesDomain leasing and rentalsDomain acquisition servicesBrokerage services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 3.3.6jQuery 2.1.4Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Montserrat, Lato, Roboto)Stripe.js v2SweetAlertGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by URLs and Stripe integration)
  • Use of escrow.com for secure transactions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerStatcounter
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Statcounter
Tracking Pixels:
Statcounter
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:199.250.218.241 +a +mx -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2166 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:199.250.218.241
Name Servers:
ns1.inmotionhosting.com
ns2.inmotionhosting.com
MX Records:
0: names.com
SOA:Serial: 2025080501, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:152ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:199.250.218.241 +a +mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a stable but somewhat dated technology stack featuring Bootstrap 3.3.6 and jQuery 2.1.4, with integration of modern services like Stripe.js v2 for payments and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting is via InMotion Hosting, indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The site lacks a known CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt is moderate due to older libraries and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve security configurations, and enhance privacy compliance to align with current best practices.
Analyze Another Website