Skip to main content

Is deliveroostudents.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - Deliveroo Reviews

deliveroostudents.co.uk favicon

Is deliveroostudents.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Deliveroo

Check if deliveroostudents.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceUnited Kingdomlarge
Next.jsReactVercel Analytics
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:04:15 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Deliveroo Students is a specialized sub-brand of Deliveroo targeting university students in the United Kingdom, offering free delivery and exclusive restaurant discounts throughout the academic year. The website is designed with a modern Next.js framework and hosted on Vercel, providing a fast and mobile-optimized user experience. The site includes a sign-up form collecting university email addresses with required consent for terms and optional marketing communications, reflecting basic privacy compliance. However, no cookie consent mechanism is present, and no direct contact information is provided on the site. The domain WHOIS lookup failed due to an invalid domain name per Nominet UK rules, raising concerns about the domain's registration legitimacy despite the professional branding and linkage to official Deliveroo domains.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactVercel Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model focuses on leveraging Deliveroo's existing food delivery platform to engage the student demographic through targeted discounts and free delivery offers. This approach aims to increase order volume and brand loyalty among university students. The website's linkage to the main Deliveroo domain and privacy policies suggests it is an official or closely affiliated campaign. The absence of direct contact details and the invalid domain registration may indicate a temporary or campaign-specific domain rather than a standalone entity. The market positioning is clear, targeting a niche segment within the broader food delivery market in the UK.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and secure form inputs with required consent checkboxes, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap under GDPR. The domain registration irregularity is a significant concern for trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, explicit incident response contacts, and enhanced privacy compliance mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Deliveroo

Description:

Deliveroo Students offers university students access to free delivery and exclusive restaurant offers, vouchers, and deals throughout the academic year.

Key Services:
Student discount codesFree delivery on eligible ordersExclusive restaurant offers and vouchers
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactVercel Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Vercel
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Secure form inputs with required fields and consent checkboxes

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Vercel Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Vercel Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.1.129, 216.150.1.1
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.comDNS only
ns2.vercel-dns.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: deliveroostudents-co-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1742288004, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based Next.js framework and hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The use of deferred JavaScript loading and preloading of key assets contributes to performance optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured page titles. Accessibility is addressed with semantic HTML and form labels. However, no CMS is detected, and no server-side security headers were found in the provided data. The domain registration issue represents a technical risk that could impact business operations and user trust.
Analyze Another Website