Skip to main content

Is depinhub.io a Scam? Security Check Results - PrivacyGuardian.org llc Reviews

depinhub.io favicon

Is depinhub.io Safe? Security Analysis for PrivacyGuardian.org llc

Check if depinhub.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSHotjarTwitter Universal Website Tag
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:55:20 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

DePIN Hub is a technology-focused platform dedicated to empowering decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN). The website serves as a hub for discovering DePIN projects, providing news, educational content, and opportunities to earn passive income by participating in these decentralized networks. Positioned as a niche information aggregator and community resource, it targets web3 enthusiasts and participants in the DePIN ecosystem. The platform is relatively new, founded in 2023, and operates under a privacy-protected domain registration.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSHotjarTwitter Universal Website Tag

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model centers on content aggregation, project promotion, and affiliate marketing within the DePIN space. It leverages partnerships and social media presence to build credibility and reach. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on DePIN, a growing sector in decentralized infrastructure. Revenue streams likely include affiliate links and sponsored content. The company maintains a small but consistent brand presence with professional design and active social media engagement, though lacks explicit contact and compliance documentation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS, enhancing security and performance. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Tracking and analytics tools are used without visible cookie consent mechanisms, indicating privacy compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

PrivacyGuardian.org llc

Description:

We bring you real world use cases of web3 through DePIN. And btw, you can generate passive income along the way!

Key Services:
Project discovery and trackingNews and blog contentEarning guides and affiliate links
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSHotjarTwitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks:
ReactNext.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HotjarGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Twitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
HotjarTwitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing Tools:
HotjarTwitter Ads
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a modern React/Next.js SPA with good SEO and social media integration.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_kjb@kajabi.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:depinhub.io
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/13/2025 (68 days)
SANs:depinhub.io, dh-news-bot.depinhub.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.70.142, 172.67.136.56
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3036::6815:468e, 2606:4700:3033::ac43:8838
Name Servers:
celine.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
mcgrory.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381307772, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:113ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted likely behind Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. It integrates third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Hotjar and Twitter Ads. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization with a clean, professional design. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO is good but could be enhanced with more structured data and metadata. The technical infrastructure is solid for a small technology platform but would benefit from improved security configurations and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website