Skip to main content

Is designm.ag a Scam? Security Check Results - Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot Reviews

designm.ag favicon

Is designm.ag Safe? Security Analysis for Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot

Check if designm.ag is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Statessmall
WordPressjQueryYoast SEO PremiumGoogle FontsFont Awesome
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:36:40 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

DesignM.ag is a niche media website focused on design, web development, and creative resources. It offers tutorials, inspiration, freebies, and freelance advice targeting designers and creative professionals. The site is built on WordPress, hosted on SiteGround, and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Yoast SEO for optimization. The website has a consistent brand presence and active social media channels, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryYoast SEO PremiumGoogle FontsFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a content publishing platform monetized likely through advertising and partnerships. It targets a specialized audience of designers and developers, providing valuable resources and tutorials. The domain age and hosting provider indicate a stable operation. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for media sites. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a focus on web-based contact forms. The partnership with WPKube is evident through footer links. The business model is content-driven with potential revenue from advertising and sponsored posts.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot

Description:

DesignM.ag is a media website focused on design-related content including tutorials, resources, inspiration, freelance, interviews, and freebies. It provides articles and posts about web design, development, and creative resources.

Key Services:
design tutorialsresources for designersinspiration articlesfreelance adviceinterviewsfreebies
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryYoast SEO PremiumGoogle FontsFont Awesome
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based design media site with regular content updates.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.208.179.28 include:designm.ag.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(296 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:35.208.179.28
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.net
ns2.siteground.net
MX Records:
10: mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
30: mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
20: mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
SOA:Serial: 183, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:158ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.208.179.28 include:designm.ag.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for SEO optimization. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts for styling. Hosting is provided by SiteGround as inferred from nameservers. The site has moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The HTML is valid and well-structured. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress core and plugins detected. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly found in the provided HTML content. The site uses standard web fonts and Font Awesome icons for UI elements.
Analyze Another Website