Skip to main content

Is devacon.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - devacon.lv Reviews

devacon.lv favicon

Is devacon.lv Safe? Security Analysis for devacon.lv

Check if devacon.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:23:37 PM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website devacon.lv currently serves as a minimal maintenance or placeholder page with very limited content and no visible business information. The absence of metadata, contact details, or policies suggests the site is either under development or temporarily offline. The company behind the domain cannot be identified from the website content or WHOIS data, which is unavailable due to query limits. Technically, the site uses WordPress CMS with basic JavaScript and CSS for maintenance mode but lacks modern SEO, accessibility, and security features. Security posture is weak with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating low compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile and minimal business credibility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be registered but WHOIS data is inaccessible, preventing assessment of company legitimacy or market positioning. No partnerships, certifications, or contact channels are evident. The site likely targets a general audience but currently offers no services or content. Without further data, the business model, revenue streams, or growth indicators remain unknown.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal and insufficient for a production website. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of contact information and WHOIS transparency further reduces trust. The site does not appear to use any advanced security frameworks or practices. This exposes the domain to potential risks including data interception, lack of compliance with GDPR, and poor user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and appears to be a maintenance or placeholder page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web10.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.77.200
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.devacon.lv
20: mx2.garmtech.com
SOA:Serial: 2025031104, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web10.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS and currently serves a maintenance page with minimal HTML content. It includes a favicon and references to CSS and JavaScript files related to maintenance mode. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts are present. The site lacks meta tags, structured data, or Open Graph tags. Performance and mobile optimization are basic due to minimal content. No hosting provider or infrastructure details are discernible. The technical implementation is functional but very limited, indicating the site is not fully operational or publicly launched.
Analyze Another Website