Skip to main content

Is dgav11.com a Scam? Security Check Results - dgav11.com Reviews

dgav11.com favicon

Is dgav11.com Safe? Security Analysis for dgav11.com

Check if dgav11.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Nuxt.js
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:06:35 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The analyzed domain w2z75bof.dgav23.one currently serves minimal to no accessible website content, rendering it effectively inaccessible for meaningful business or user engagement. The site appears to be built on the Nuxt.js framework but lacks any visible metadata, structured data, or content, indicating either a placeholder or a blocked page. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust and legitimacy assessments, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, privacy protected, or otherwise obscured. From a security perspective, no HTTPS or security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the domain exhibits a very low maturity level both technically and from a business standpoint.

Detected Technologies

Nuxt.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of content, metadata, and contact information, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no indication of company identity, market positioning, or service offerings. The domain does not demonstrate any competitive advantages or strategic partnerships. The absence of analytics or marketing tools further indicates a lack of operational digital presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor with no evidence of HTTPS, security headers, or data protection policies. The absence of WHOIS data and minimal content raises suspicion about the domain's legitimacy and operational status. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The site is likely blocked or protected by a generic WAF, limiting further security analysis.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register and configure the domain properly with valid WHOIS information to establish legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Minimal HTML content with no visible website content; likely blocked or inaccessible due to WAF or security mechanisms.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Nuxt.js
Frameworks:
Vue.js (implied by Nuxt.js)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and essentially empty.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(108 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:18.181.183.103
Name Servers:
amber.ns.cloudflare.com
ed.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2379378884, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating potential for a modern web application. However, the current deployment serves no visible content and lacks SEO metadata, accessibility features, or performance optimizations. No hosting provider or CMS information is discernible. The minimal HTML and absence of scripts beyond the Nuxt.js core suggest an incomplete or blocked deployment. Technical debt and modernization opportunities exist, primarily focused on content delivery, security hardening, and compliance.
Analyze Another Website