Skip to main content

Is dgyousu.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Guangdong JinWanBang Technology Investment Co., Ltd. Reviews

G

Is dgyousu.com Safe? Security Analysis for Guangdong JinWanBang Technology Investment Co., Ltd.

Check if dgyousu.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinasmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 1:30:51 AM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website dgyousu.com is currently suspended and displays a simple notice in Chinese indicating that the site has been stopped by the administrator. There is no active content, no metadata, no contact information, and no visible business description on the site. The domain is registered to Guangdong JinWanBang Technology Investment Co., Ltd., a Chinese company, with a domain age consistent with the registration date in 2012. The hosting provider appears to be ns365.net based on the nameservers. The site lacks any privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no security headers or HTTPS information is available from the provided data. No tracking or analytics technologies are detected, and no social media or contact details are present. The content is safe with no adult or questionable material.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the suspension of the website, there is no available information on the business model, market positioning, or services offered. The registrant company is a technology investment firm based in Guangdong, China, but no further business intelligence can be derived from the site content. The lack of active content and contact information limits the ability to assess competitive advantages or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is poor due to the absence of HTTPS information, security headers, and DNSSEC. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, but the website itself does not demonstrate any security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site is not protected by any detectable WAF or security challenge mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity level is low.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Guangdong JinWanBang Technology Investment Co., Ltd.

Description:

No business description available on the website. The site is currently suspended and displays a notice indicating it has been stopped by the administrator.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently suspended and displays a notice in Chinese indicating the site has been stopped by the administrator.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(382 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.113.223.45
Name Servers:
ns10.ns365.net
ns11.ns365.net
ns12.ns365.net
ns9.ns365.net
SOA:Serial: 2012090721, TTL: 43200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:375ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a static suspension notice with minimal HTML and no scripts or external resources. The hosting provider is identified via nameservers as ns365.net. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate due to minimal content but overall technical implementation is poor. There is significant technical debt and modernization opportunity if the site is to be relaunched.
Analyze Another Website