Skip to main content

Is diakonija.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskā baznīcas Diakonijas centrs Reviews

L

Is diakonija.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskā baznīcas Diakonijas centrs

Check if diakonija.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviamedium
jQueryGoogle FontsTwitter Widgets
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:45:17 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskā baznīcas Diakonijas centrs operates as a non-profit organization focused on social aid and community support within Latvia. The website presents various social projects, day centers, and volunteer initiatives aimed at vulnerable populations. The organization targets local Latvian communities needing social rehabilitation and assistance. Technically, the website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts, with embedded Twitter widgets for social media integration. The site lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited compliance with data protection regulations. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and branding align with a legitimate non-profit entity. Overall, the site provides relevant content but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protect user data.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle FontsTwitter Widgets

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization is positioned as a medium-sized non-profit entity within the social services sector in Latvia. It leverages volunteer engagement and project funding to deliver community aid services. The website content reflects a focus on social rehabilitation, food aid, and child protection, targeting vulnerable groups and volunteers. The business model relies on donations and partnerships, with some collaboration indicated by external links to partner sites like GlobalPro. The lack of detailed business registration data and contact information on the site limits transparency. Growth indicators include active project listings and event announcements. The partnership ecosystem appears modest but relevant to the non-profit sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of outdated libraries like jQuery without clear versioning may pose risks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer presence. These gaps expose the organization to potential data privacy and security risks, especially given the handling of sensitive social service information. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations appears minimal. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS site-wide with valid SSL/TLS certificates and enforce redirects from HTTP.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskā baznīcas Diakonijas centrs

Description:

Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskā baznīcas Diakonijas centrs is a non-profit organization focused on social support, diaconal services, and community aid in Latvia. It operates various day centers, projects, and volunteer initiatives aimed at helping vulnerable groups and promoting social welfare.

Key Services:
Day centers for social rehabilitationFood aid (food packages, soup kitchen)Volunteer programsSocial projects and eventsChild protection services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle FontsTwitter Widgets
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is in Latvian language targeting local community.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:159.148.230.83
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: diakonija-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1752673633, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a basic technology stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and Twitter widgets. The HTML and CSS are legacy and not fully modernized, with some inline styles and older layout techniques. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern frameworks and optimization. Mobile optimization is basic, with no explicit responsive design detected. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the content. Technical debt is evident, and modernization opportunities exist to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website