Skip to main content

Is die-101-besten.de a Scam? Security Check Results - die-101-besten.de Reviews

die-101-besten.de favicon

Is die-101-besten.de Safe? Security Analysis for Startseite - Die 101 Besten DE

https://die-101-besten.de

Check if die-101-besten.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityGermanysmall
jQueryWordPressBorlabs CookieGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 5:38:12 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Die 101 Besten DE is a German-language luxury hotel ranking and editorial platform focusing on the top 101 hotels in Germany. The website provides curated rankings, hotel categories, special editions, and partner showcases targeting luxury travelers and hospitality professionals. It positions itself as a niche authority in the German luxury hospitality market, leveraging guest reviews, expert evaluations, and partner collaborations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, uses jQuery, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. It employs Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent management, indicating some level of privacy compliance. The site is hosted on servers associated with kasserver.com and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure connections. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a gap in compliance and user trust. Security headers are not evident, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Overall, the site demonstrates good content quality, professional design, and moderate technical maturity but could improve in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

jQueryWordPressBorlabs CookieGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform operates in the hospitality sector, specifically targeting luxury hotel rankings in Germany. Its business model revolves around content curation, editorial rankings, and partnerships with luxury brands and service providers. The presence of numerous partner logos and external links suggests a broad partnership ecosystem that may support revenue through sponsorships or advertising. The target audience includes affluent travelers, hotel industry stakeholders, and luxury lifestyle consumers. The site’s market position is niche but authoritative within German luxury hospitality. Growth potential exists through expanded content, enhanced user engagement, and improved compliance. The lack of direct contact information and detailed company data limits transparency but does not detract from its editorial focus.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is fundamental for secure communications. It uses a cookie consent mechanism via Borlabs Cookie, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a best practice for mature security postures. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

101 besten Hotels Deutschlands - Das Ranking basiert auf: Gästebewertungen, Rezensionen der besten Portale und Beurteilungen von Experten.

Key Services:
Hotel rankingsHotel category listingsSpecial editions and awardsPartner and sponsor promotion
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryWordPressBorlabs CookieGoogle Tag Manager
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a German luxury hotel ranking and editorial platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 18 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:78.46.9.198
Name Servers:
ns5.kasserver.com
ns6.kasserver.com
MX Records:
10: w0204cb7.kasserver.com
SOA:Serial: 2505170855, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. It employs Borlabs Cookie for cookie management, indicating integration with GDPR compliance tools. The site uses modern font loading techniques and responsive design elements, supporting good mobile optimization. Hosting is provided by kasserver.com as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and lazy loading of images. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured JSON-LD data. Technical risks include lack of security headers and absence of visible privacy and legal documentation which could impact compliance and user trust.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about die-101-besten.de

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website