Skip to main content

Is digg.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Digg Inc. Reviews

digg.com favicon

Is digg.com Safe? Security Analysis for Digg Inc.

Check if digg.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebP imagesModern CSS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:40:52 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Digg Inc. operates a modern, human-first community platform focused on curated internet content and authentic connections. The website presents a professional and engaging user experience, emphasizing invite-only beta access and mobile app availability for iOS and Android. The platform targets general internet users interested in discovering and sharing quality content. Technically, the site leverages a modern React and Next.js stack, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form inputs, though some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the site's professional presentation and clear privacy policies. Overall, Digg demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebP imagesModern CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Digg positions itself as a niche social and community platform emphasizing authentic user engagement and content discovery. Its invite-only beta model suggests a controlled growth strategy, potentially monetizing through advertising or premium features. The company maintains active social media channels across major platforms, enhancing brand visibility and user engagement. The lack of public contact information and WHOIS transparency indicates a focus on privacy and controlled communication channels. Digg's business model likely revolves around community-driven content curation, leveraging mobile platforms to reach a broad audience. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, indicating a standalone operation or early-stage growth.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Form inputs include validation, reducing injection risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No public security policy or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program is evident, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve defense against web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Digg Inc.

Description:

Digg is where people go to look at cool things while they eat a big bowl of cereal. We’re building a human-first community platform that places authentic community and connection at the forefront. From day one.

Key Services:
Community platformContent discoveryMobile apps for iOS and Android
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebP imagesModern CSS
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
WebiOS appAndroid app
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:aspmx.sailthru.com include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1209 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.1.1
Name Servers:
barbara.ns.cloudflare.com
darl.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2382508912, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:289ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:aspmx.sailthru.com include:aspmx.googlemail.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and optimized image delivery with WebP format. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized, providing excellent user experience across devices. Performance indicators suggest fast loading times and efficient resource usage. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or proprietary content management approach. The absence of explicit hosting provider data limits infrastructure insights. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further improved with ARIA roles and landmarks. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and modern, supporting the business goals effectively.
Analyze Another Website