Skip to main content

Is digitalchamber.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Chamber of Digital Commerce Reviews

digitalchamber.org favicon

Is digitalchamber.org Safe? Security Analysis for Chamber of Digital Commerce

Check if digitalchamber.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
WordPressGravity FormsGiveWP (donation plugin)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+5 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:41:24 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Digital Chamber is a well-established trade association focused on blockchain and digital asset advocacy, founded in 2014. It holds a leading market position in the blockchain policy space in the US, providing services such as policy advocacy, education, and event organization. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with rich content targeting industry stakeholders and policymakers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, hosted on WP Engine, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGravity FormsGiveWP (donation plugin)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarFontAwesomeBootstrapSwiper.jsYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization leverages its long-standing presence to influence blockchain policy and innovation. Its business model centers on advocacy and industry collaboration, supported by partnerships and events like the DC Blockchain Summit. The target audience includes blockchain businesses, regulators, and the public interested in digital assets. The site’s content and external links indicate active engagement with policy and technology sectors, particularly in energy and digital finance. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication approach typical for trade associations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions and data submissions. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified and common for organizations of this type. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, indicating potential gaps in transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Chamber of Digital Commerce

Description:

The Digital Chamber is the world's leading blockchain and digital asset trade association, advocating for blockchain innovation, digital assets, and related policy since 2014. They focus on advancing pro-innovation legislation, protecting access to digital assets, and expanding participation in the digital economy.

Key Services:
Policy advocacyIndustry educationLegislative engagementEvent organization (e.g., DC Blockchain Summit)Publishing reports and comment letters
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGravity FormsGiveWP (donation plugin)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarFontAwesomeBootstrapSwiper.jsYoast SEO
Frameworks:
Bootstrap 4.1.3
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Client-side form validation
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional trade association for blockchain and digital assets.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.23.251.164 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:et._spf.pardot.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(289 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.198.155.193
Name Servers:
ns47.domaincontrol.com
ns48.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
30: mx3.solidspace.com
20: mx2.solidspace.com
10: digitalchamber-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
40: mx4.solidspace.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090204, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.23.251.164 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:et._spf.pardot.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and integrates several third-party libraries including Gravity Forms for form handling and GiveWP for donations. It uses Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. Hosting is provided by WP Engine, a reputable managed WordPress host. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and rich media content, optimized for mobile devices. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website