Skip to main content

Is digitalconstructionweek.com a Scam? Security Check Results - digitalconstructionweek.com Reviews

D

Is digitalconstructionweek.com Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if digitalconstructionweek.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3Cloudflare DNS
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:06:23 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website digitalconstructionweek.com is currently inaccessible beyond a Cloudflare security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated access. This indicates a protective security posture against bots but also limits content visibility and analysis. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period, supporting its legitimacy as an established event or business site. However, no business or contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service are visible in the provided HTML content, limiting the ability to assess compliance and business credibility. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks visible SEO, accessibility, or security headers in the accessible content.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3Cloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the content being blocked by a security challenge, no direct business intelligence such as company name, services, or market positioning can be extracted. The domain age and registrar data suggest a stable presence since 2015, likely related to digital construction events or services. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The lack of visible contact or policy information reduces transparency and trust signals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site demonstrates a basic security posture by employing Cloudflare protection and Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated threats. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are visible in the HTML content, indicating room for improvement. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests compliance gaps. The security score is moderate but limited by the inability to fully analyze the backend or additional pages.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

Page is a Cloudflare security verification challenge with invisible reCAPTCHA and minimal content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3Cloudflare DNS
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a Cloudflare security verification page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:digitalconstructionweek.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/2/2025 (32 days)
SANs:digitalconstructionweek.com, *.digitalconstructionweek.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1265 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.19.59, 172.67.185.71
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3037::6815:133b, 2606:4700:3034::ac43:b947
Name Servers:
mark.ns.cloudflare.com
olga.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: digitalconstructionweek-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2376157261, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and layout and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot detection. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare DNS and security services. The HTML content is minimal and focused solely on security verification, lacking typical website content or metadata. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the provided data. Performance and accessibility are limited due to the blocking page. There is an opportunity to modernize and enrich the site with better SEO, accessibility, and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website