Skip to main content

Is digitalpublicgoods.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Digital Public Goods Alliance Reviews

digitalpublicgoods.net favicon

Is digitalpublicgoods.net Safe? Security Analysis for Digital Public Goods Alliance

Check if digitalpublicgoods.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)WordPress CMSPHPJavaScriptCSS+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:56:00 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Digital Public Goods Alliance is a multi-stakeholder non-profit initiative dedicated to accelerating the Sustainable Development Goals through the promotion and facilitation of digital public goods. Their website serves as a hub for information, resources, and collaboration tools related to open-source technologies and digital public goods. The organization targets governments, NGOs, developers, and other stakeholders interested in sustainable development and equitable technology access. Their market position is that of a recognized alliance in the digital public goods ecosystem, providing key services such as a registry, standards, toolkits, and community reports. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and uses standard plugins including All in One SEO and MonsterInsights for Google Analytics tracking. The site is hosted partially on Amazon S3 for media assets and employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is implemented at a basic level with meta tags and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide a security.txt or incident response contact information. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and social media presence support the organization's authenticity. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content and design but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency regarding domain registration. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen the organization's digital trust and security posture.

Detected Technologies

Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)WordPress CMSPHPJavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Digital Public Goods Alliance operates as a non-profit alliance focused on digital public goods to support sustainable development globally. Their business model centers on collaboration, knowledge sharing, and standard setting rather than commercial revenue generation. The target audience includes governments, NGOs, developers, and international organizations. The alliance leverages partnerships and community engagement to maintain its ecosystem. The website content and linked social media channels indicate active engagement and a growing presence in the digital public goods space. The lack of detailed business registration data and physical addresses suggests a decentralized or international organizational structure. The alliance's competitive advantage lies in its multi-stakeholder approach and alignment with global development goals.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@digitalpublicgoods.net

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of a security.txt file and incident response contact information indicates limited readiness for vulnerability reporting and incident handling. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Digital Public Goods Alliance

Description:

The Digital Public Goods Alliance is a multi-stakeholder initiative that accelerates the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals by facilitating the discovery, development, use of, and investment in digital public goods. It promotes open-source technologies for a more equitable world.

Key Services:
Digital Public Goods RegistryDPG Standard and ToolkitCommunity of Practice ReportsCalls for Collaborative ActionAnnual ecosystem reports
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)WordPress CMSPHPJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Frameworks:
WordPress theme (dpga)All in One SEO plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(154 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 58, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a custom theme and standard SEO and analytics plugins. It uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Media assets are hosted on Amazon S3, indicating a hybrid hosting approach. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive with good design quality. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO implementation includes meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data, though some SEO aspects like sitemap and robots directives could be enhanced. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website