Skip to main content

Is digitalscholar.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Corporation for Digital Scholarship Reviews

C

Is digitalscholar.org Safe? Security Analysis for Corporation for Digital Scholarship

Check if digitalscholar.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScript (ES Modules)
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:10:27 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Corporation for Digital Scholarship is a US-based nonprofit organization founded in 2009, dedicated to developing and sustaining open-source software and services for researchers and cultural heritage institutions. Their portfolio includes well-known digital humanities tools such as Omeka, Zotero, Tropy, PressForward, and Sourcery, positioning them as a key player in the digital scholarship ecosystem. The website reflects a professional, well-structured digital presence with clear information about leadership, governance, and partnerships with reputable academic institutions. Technically, the site uses modern web standards with modular JavaScript and responsive design, though no advanced frameworks or CMS are detected. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript (ES Modules)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates as a nonprofit focusing on digital humanities and scholarly software development. Their business model centers on stewardship and sustainability of open-source projects, supported by partnerships with academic and cultural institutions. The target audience includes historians, researchers, and cultural heritage professionals. The presence of a clear leadership team and board of directors, along with governance policies, indicates mature organizational structure. The partnership ecosystem includes prominent universities and digital history centers, enhancing credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include grants, donations, and service contracts related to software support and development. Growth indicators include ongoing project launches and sustained community engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@digitalscholar.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) are detected in the provided data, which are recommended best practices. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency in security management. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. The absence of tracking scripts and analytics reduces privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a nonprofit informational site but could be enhanced by implementing additional security controls and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Corporation for Digital Scholarship

Description:

The Corporation for Digital Scholarship is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the development of software and services for researchers and cultural heritage institutions. They develop and operate software projects such as Omeka, Zotero, Tropy, PressForward, and Sourcery.

Key Services:
Omeka - web publishing platform for digital collectionsZotero - research assistant tool for collecting and citing researchTropy - research photo managementPressForward - web content gathering and publishingSourcery - remote archive research connection
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript (ES Modules)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://digitalscholar.org/)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a nonprofit digital scholarship organization with a clear mission and established software projects.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(29 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.108.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.111.153, 185.199.110.153
Name Servers:
dns1.name-services.com
dns2.name-services.com
dns3.name-services.com
dns4.name-services.com
dns5.name-services.com
MX Records:
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
10: ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 1705940976, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:258ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with clean, modern HTML5 and CSS3, and uses JavaScript modules for interactivity. No heavy frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight static site approach. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO meta tags including description and viewport settings. Performance appears moderate, with no obvious heavy external dependencies or tracking scripts. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience suitable for the organization's mission.
Analyze Another Website