Skip to main content

Is digoexpress.com a Scam? Security Check Results - digoexpress.com Reviews

D

Is digoexpress.com Safe? Security Analysis for Not Found

Check if digoexpress.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 12:41:58 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The domain digoexpress.com is registered since 2014 with a long registration period until 2034, managed by Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. However, the website itself is inaccessible beyond a standard HTTP 404 Not Found error page, indicating no active content or business presence online. There is no metadata, no forms, no contact information, and no security or privacy policies available on the site. The lack of content and technical implementation suggests the website is either abandoned, under construction, or misconfigured. The hosting provider is identified as Alibaba Cloud, but no further technical details or CMS platforms are detected. Security posture is minimal with no HTTPS or security headers observed. No WAF or security challenge mechanisms are detected, confirming the site is simply non-existent rather than blocked. Overall, the website does not provide any business or security information, resulting in a very low trust and credibility score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of website content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain registration is consistent with a legitimate registrar but does not provide any insight into business operations, market positioning, or services. No contact details, social media, or partner domains are found. The domain age suggests potential for an established business, but the lack of active content negates this. No revenue streams, customer segments, or partnerships are identifiable.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security best practices. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain does not appear to be protected by a WAF or similar security mechanism. The lack of content also means no forms or inputs are present to assess for vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is not secure or compliant with modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enable HTTPS to secure the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is inaccessible beyond a 404 error page

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:182.92.156.197
Name Servers:
dns7.hichina.comDNS only
dns8.hichina.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:449ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML 404 error page with no metadata, scripts, or external resources. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, but no performance or mobile optimization data is available due to lack of content. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. The technical infrastructure appears incomplete or inactive, representing a significant risk for business operations and user engagement.
Analyze Another Website