Skip to main content

Is directories.so a Scam? Security Check Results - directories.so Reviews

directories.so favicon

Is directories.so Safe? Security Analysis for Directories

Check if directories.so is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSWebP images
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:20:28 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Directories.so is a curated online directory platform launched in 2024, focusing on aggregating high-quality directories across various sectors such as AI, design, e-commerce, marketing, and travel. The website serves users looking for trusted and categorized directory listings, leveraging affiliate links and user submissions as part of its business model. The platform is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with content managed likely via a headless CMS (Sanity.io). The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation and relevant content.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSWebP images

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business positions itself as a niche directory aggregator, targeting digital professionals, creatives, and tech enthusiasts. Its competitive advantage lies in curated, categorized listings with domain rating indicators and affiliate partnerships. The business model appears to rely on affiliate marketing and directory submissions. The company is small, newly founded in 2024, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. Partnerships are indicated through external linked domains and affiliate URLs. Growth potential exists through expanding directory categories and improving compliance and transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain status clientTransferProhibited set, indicating basic domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are recommended for enhanced protection. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response contact information, representing compliance and transparency gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The ultimate directory of the best AI, design, e-commerce, products, tools, travel, and other directories on the internet.

Key Services:
Curated directory listingsAffiliate referralsDirectory submissions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSWebP images
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a curated directory aggregator with a focus on technology and creative sectors.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(233 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1720482935, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering and static generation capabilities, enhancing performance and SEO. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript, CSS, and optimized images. Hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site structure is clear with well-organized categories and listings. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by adding security headers and improving compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website