Skip to main content

Is dizainaapartamenti.hotelonia.com a Scam? Security Check Results - hotelonia.com Reviews

dizainaapartamenti.hotelonia.com favicon

Is dizainaapartamenti.hotelonia.com Safe? Security Analysis for hotelonia.com

Check if dizainaapartamenti.hotelonia.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityN/asmall
jQueryBootstrapTetherMobiriseFormoid
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:40:44 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Hotelonia.com operates as an online hotel and apartment booking affiliate platform, offering users access to over 100,000 hotel deals worldwide. The website targets general travelers and families seeking affordable accommodations, leveraging affiliate partnerships to monetize bookings. The platform's market position is that of a budget-friendly hotel finder with a focus on 5-star reviewed properties and popular destinations such as New York, Madrid, London, and Barcelona. The business model relies on affiliate marketing through tracking domains and partner sites.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapTetherMobiriseFormoid

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company appears to be a small-sized hospitality affiliate service with consistent branding and a clear focus on hotel bookings. It maintains partnerships through affiliate tracking domains and hosts subsidiary domains for specific properties. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a lean operational model focused on digital engagement via forms and social media. The website's content quality and user experience are good, supporting its competitive positioning in the online travel market. However, the lack of explicit privacy consent mechanisms and security policies may impact user trust and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form inputs, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. There is no visible security or incident response policy, and no dedicated contact channels for security issues. The absence of cookie consent banners and limited privacy compliance indicators suggest gaps in GDPR adherence. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the security posture is moderate and could benefit from enhanced headers, explicit consent mechanisms, and published security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

hotelonia.com

Description:

Find your next hotel at the best price. More than 100,000 Hotels deals. Travel with all your family.

Key Services:
Hotel search and bookingApartment bookingHotel deals and offers
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapTetherMobiriseFormoid
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form inputs with required fields

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses affiliate marketing model for hotel bookings

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:167.86.114.90 ~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.hotelonia.com
Issuer:E5
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (89 days)
SANs:*.hotelonia.com, hotelonia.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:167.86.114.90
Name Servers:
megan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
plato.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
3600: mail.hotelonia.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Mobirise CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, providing a responsive and mobile-optimized user interface. Performance is moderate with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta descriptions and alternate language links present. The technical stack is modern but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and security features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business model but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website