Skip to main content

Is dizozols.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Dižozols Plus SIA Reviews

D

Is dizozols.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Dižozols Plus SIA

Check if dizozols.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviamedium
WordPress 4.7.29Visual ComposerSlider RevolutionGoogle Maps APIGoogle reCAPTCHA+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:34:49 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Dižozols Plus SIA is a Latvian furniture manufacturing company specializing in bent wood and solid wood furniture production since 1993. The company offers a full cycle of development, manufacturing, assembly, and logistics services, aiming to be a preferred partner in Eastern Europe. Their website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and includes a professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms, and a cookie consent banner, though some security headers are missing. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates good digital maturity with room for security and compliance improvements.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 4.7.29Visual ComposerSlider RevolutionGoogle Maps APIGoogle reCAPTCHAjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a strong position in the Latvian furniture industry with ambitions to lead in Eastern Europe. Their business model focuses on manufacturing high-quality bent wood furniture and providing end-to-end services. The website targets furniture industry clients and partners, showcasing product categories like chairs, tables, and sofas. Social media presence and Google Maps integration support their market visibility. The lack of explicit privacy and terms policies suggests an area for compliance enhancement. No suspicious domains or partners were identified.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The WordPress version is outdated, potentially exposing the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with updates and additional controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dižozols Plus SIA

Description:

Dižozols Plus is a 100% Latvian owned company started in 1993 specializing in production of a wide range of high quality furniture using bent wood and solid wood. They provide full cycle development, manufacturing, assembly, and logistics aiming to be a preferred partner. Their mission is to provide excellent service and sustainable products with care for people and environment. Vision is to become leading manufacturer of curved plywood design chairs and components in Eastern Europe.

Key Services:
Furniture productionBent wood manufacturingDevelopment and productionAssembly and logistics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 4.7.29Visual ComposerSlider RevolutionGoogle Maps APIGoogle reCAPTCHAjQuery
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsYandex MetrikaFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelYandex Metrika
Marketing Tools:
Facebook PixelYandex Metrika
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:admin@dizozols.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.197
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: dizozols.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073006, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:93ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress 4.7.29 with Visual Composer and Slider Revolution plugins, integrating Google Maps and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with some minified CSS and JS. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated CMS version, indicating technical debt and potential risk. Overall, the infrastructure supports business needs but requires modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website