Skip to main content

Is domaining.com a Scam? Security Check Results - domaining.com Reviews

domaining.com favicon

Is domaining.com Safe? Security Analysis for Domaining

Check if domaining.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Bootstrap 3.0.3jQuery 2.1.1Google Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerHTML5shiv (conditional for IE < 9)
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 9:02:11 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Domaining.com is a specialized online platform focused on the domain name industry, providing news, auction results, sales reports, and domain-related tools targeted at domain investors and industry professionals. The website aggregates content from multiple domain news sources and offers various due diligence and domain research tools. Technically, the site uses a classic Bootstrap 3 framework with jQuery and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is accessible over HTTPS and shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business information.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 3.0.3jQuery 2.1.1Google Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerHTML5shiv (conditional for IE < 9)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Domaining.com occupies a niche position within the domain industry as a news aggregator and resource hub. Its business model revolves around providing timely domain sales data, auction recaps, and industry insights, attracting domain investors and domainers as its primary audience. The site leverages partnerships with domain marketplaces and data providers like NameBio, Sedo, and Dynadot. Revenue likely derives from advertising and affiliate links to domain services. The platform's consistent content updates and domain tools indicate an engaged community focus, though the lack of detailed company information and WHOIS transparency limits full business credibility. The site’s ecosystem includes external domain-related services and advertising partners, reinforcing its domain industry specialization.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@domaining.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy compliance indicators suggests potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security policy pages are published, limiting transparency on security governance. The WHOIS data absence is a risk factor for trust and domain legitimacy. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security best practices and compliance documentation are recommended to enhance the site's security maturity and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Domaining is the business of making money with internet domain names. Find out here the latest news and views about the domain industry.

Key Services:
Domain industry news aggregationDomain tools and resourcesDomain sales and auction reportsDomain due diligence tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 3.0.3jQuery 2.1.1Google Analytics (gtag.js)Google Tag ManagerHTML5shiv (conditional for IE < 9)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
NameAdsCatchy.com
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche news and resource platform for domain investors and industry professionals.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a:domaining.com ip4:209.213.97.0/24 ip4:207.21.195.0/24 ip4:207.21.196.2 ip4:207.21.196.3 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:207.21.195.73
Name Servers:
dns1.easydns.comDNS only
dns2.easydns.netDNS only
dns3.easydns.orgDNS only
dns4.easydns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1733674298, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a:domaining.com ip4:209.213.97.0/24 ip4:207.21.195.0/24 ip4:207.21.196.2 ip4:207.21.196.3 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a legacy Bootstrap 3 framework with jQuery 2.1.1, which while stable, is dated and may pose maintenance challenges. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS from CDNs, which aids performance but requires monitoring for third-party risks. The HTML structure is valid with meta tags for SEO and social verification. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially on mobile devices. No modern CMS or platform is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt is present due to older libraries and lack of modern security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve accessibility, and enhance SEO further.
Analyze Another Website