Is doms.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rīgas Doms
Check if doms.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Rīgas Doms operates as a non-profit religious and cultural organization based in Riga, Latvia, providing religious services, concerts, and tourism information. The website serves as a portal for parishioners and visitors, offering event schedules, spiritual content, and visitor guidance. The organization maintains a modest but consistent online presence with clear branding and structured navigation, targeting a general audience interested in religious and cultural activities. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Velocity.js, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, with a responsive design suitable for mobile devices. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and no visible CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site shows basic good practices such as HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information for incident response reduces compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is safe and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Rīgas Doms holds a stable position as a local religious and cultural institution in Latvia, focusing on community engagement through worship services and cultural events like concerts. The business model is non-profit, relying on donations and community participation. The website supports this by providing event information and spiritual resources. The organization leverages social media platforms to extend its reach and engagement. There is no evidence of commercial activities or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are modest, aligned with its community-focused mission. Partnerships with related religious organizations are indicated through external links. The website content and structure reflect a clear understanding of its target audience and mission.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, which is essential. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further impacts compliance and user trust. Overall, the security culture appears minimal but functional.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Rīgas Doms
Rīgas Doma mājas lapa: draudze, koncerti un tūrisma informācija.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No visible exposed sensitive data
- No vulnerable libraries detected from provided scripts
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
DMARC Partial Enforcement
LOWDMARC only applies to 20% of messages
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 42 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings